Building trust and rapport early in the new doctor-patient relationship: a longitudinal qualitative study
- PMID: 28148254
- PMCID: PMC5288896
- DOI: 10.1186/s12909-017-0868-5
Building trust and rapport early in the new doctor-patient relationship: a longitudinal qualitative study
Abstract
Background: New patients are a particularly vulnerable population because they are at high risk of missing a subsequent visit or dropping out of care completely. However, few data exist on what new patients value in the beginning of a relationship with a new provider. Persons with HIV infection may be an ideal population to study the drivers of a positive initial patient-provider relationship, as it is a chronic and serious condition that requires a reliable, ongoing relationship with a provider. Informed by patients' real experiences, this study aims to identify what patients see as the most critical elements for building trust and rapport from the outset.
Methods: We conducted longitudinal, in-person interviews with 21 patients new to the HIV clinic at the Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Houston, Texas, from August 2013 to March 2015. Patients were interviewed across three time points: once before their first provider visit, a second time within two weeks after the first visit, and a third time at 6 to 12 months after the first provider visit.
Results: We conducted 61 h of patient interviews. The mean age was 53 years; 52% were non-Hispanic white, 23% were non-Hispanic black and 19% were Hispanic. Patients described significant anxiety and vulnerability not just from HIV itself, but also in starting a relationship as a new patient to a new provider. Our analysis of these experiences revealed five actions providers can take to reduce their patients' anxiety and build trust early in the first visit: 1) provide reassurance to patients, 2) tell patients it's okay to ask questions, 3) show patients their lab results and explain what they mean, 4) avoid language and behaviors that are judgmental of patients, and 5) ask patients what they want [i.e., treatment goals and preferences].
Conclusions: Our study incorporates direct input from patients and highlights the unique psychological challenges that patients face in seeking care from a new provider. The actionable opportunities cited by patients have the potential to mitigate patients' feelings of anxiety and vulnerability, and thereby improve their overall health care experience.
Keywords: HIV infection; Health communication; Longitudinal studies; Patient engagement; Patient preference; Patient satisfaction; Patient-centered care; Physician-patient relations; Qualitative studies; Retention in care.
Similar articles
-
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015. PMID: 26447009
-
The psychology of the wait time experience - what clinics can do to manage the waiting experience for patients: a longitudinal, qualitative study.BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jul 8;19(1):459. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4301-0. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019. PMID: 31286957 Free PMC article.
-
Retaining HIV Patients in Care: The Role of Initial Patient Care Experiences.AIDS Behav. 2016 Oct;20(10):2477-2487. doi: 10.1007/s10461-016-1340-y. AIDS Behav. 2016. PMID: 26910339 Free PMC article.
-
Patient-Centered Pain Management Communication from the Patient Perspective.J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Aug;33(8):1374-1380. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4490-y. Epub 2018 May 29. J Gen Intern Med. 2018. PMID: 29845465 Free PMC article.
-
Barriers to patient-centered human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) care with African American patients who use drugs: Social construction of the typical and ideal care visit.Subst Abus. 2017 Apr-Jun;38(2):205-212. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2017.1296527. Subst Abus. 2017. PMID: 28486075
Cited by
-
Key stakeholders' experiences, knowledge and perspectives regarding care quality for breast cancer in South-West Nigeria.Front Oncol. 2025 May 2;15:1418649. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1418649. eCollection 2025. Front Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40386555 Free PMC article.
-
Polish adaptation, psychometric properties and validation of Physician's Trust in the Patient Scale (PTPS).Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 8;14(1):18457. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69351-1. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39117849 Free PMC article.
-
Addressing health challenges in rural Japan: a thematic analysis of social isolation and community solutions.BMC Prim Care. 2024 Jan 13;25(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02266-y. BMC Prim Care. 2024. PMID: 38216862 Free PMC article.
-
Proliferative Sickle Cell Retinopathy: A Patient and a Physician's Perspective on Quality of Life and Quality of Eye Care.Ophthalmol Ther. 2024 Apr;13(4):851-860. doi: 10.1007/s40123-024-00893-3. Epub 2024 Feb 12. Ophthalmol Ther. 2024. PMID: 38345709 Free PMC article.
-
Understanding the Professional Care Experience of Patients with Stroke: A Qualitative Study Using In-Depth Interviews.Int J Integr Care. 2022 Oct 7;22(4):2. doi: 10.5334/ijic.6526. eCollection 2022 Oct-Dec. Int J Integr Care. 2022. PMID: 36304782 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Frankel RM, Stein T. Getting the most out of the clinical encounter: the four habits model. Perm J. 1999;3(3):79–88. - PubMed
-
- Harris MJ, Garris CP. You never get a second chance to make a first impression: behavioral consequences of first impressions. In: Ambady N, Skowronski JJ, editors. First impressions. New York: Gulford Press; 2008. p. 147-68.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous