Why scientists perform animal experiments, scientific or personal aim?
- PMID: 28149122
- PMCID: PMC5245717
- DOI: 10.5152/UCD.2016.3196
Why scientists perform animal experiments, scientific or personal aim?
Abstract
Objective: Although all animal studies are conducted in line with a specific purpose, we think that not all animal studies are performed for a scientific purpose but for personal curiosity or to fulfill a requirement. The aim of the present study is to reveal the purposes of experimental studies conducted on animals.
Matherial and methods: We searched for experimental studies performed on rats in general surgery clinics via PubMed, and obtained the e-mail addresses of the corresponding authors for each study. Afterwards, we sent a 7-item questionnaire to the authors and awaited their responses.
Results: Seventy-three (22.2%) of 329 authors responded to the questionnaire. Within these studies, 31 (42.5%) were conducted as part of a dissertation, while the remaining 19 (26.0%) were conducted to meet the academic promotion criteria. Only 23 (31.5%) were conducted for scientific purposes. The cost of 41% of those studies was higher than 2500 $.
Conclusion: As shown in this study, the main objective of carrying out animal studies in Turkey is usually to prepare a dissertation or to be entitled to academic promotion. Animal experiments must be planned and performed as scientific studies to support related clinical studies. Additionally, animal studies must have well-defined objectives and be carried out in line with scientific purposes that may lead to useful developments in medicine, rather than personal interests.
Keywords: Animal experiment; ethics; experimental study; general surgery.
Conflict of interest statement
No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.
Similar articles
-
Publication and Citation Analysis of Medical Doctors' Residency Master's Theses Involving Animal Experiments on Rats in Turkey.Altern Lab Anim. 2020 Jan;48(1):23-28. doi: 10.1177/0261192920907226. Epub 2020 Mar 20. Altern Lab Anim. 2020. PMID: 32193942
-
The 3Rs and animal welfare - conflict or the way forward?ALTEX. 2003;20(Suppl 1):63-76. ALTEX. 2003. PMID: 14671703 Review.
-
Alternatives to animal experimentation in basic research.ALTEX. 2004;21 Suppl 1:3-31. ALTEX. 2004. PMID: 15586255 Review.
-
From the History of the Croatian Dermatovenereological Society - The Croatian Medical Association and an Overview of Important Information Regarding the Journal Acta Dermatovenerologica Croatica.Acta Dermatovenerol Croat. 2018 Dec;26(4):344-348. Acta Dermatovenerol Croat. 2018. PMID: 30665489
-
Benefits and pitfalls of scientific research during undergraduate medical education.GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2010;27(5):Doc72. doi: 10.3205/zma000709. Epub 2010 Nov 15. GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2010. PMID: 21818217 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ong SL, Gravante G, Metcalfe MS, Dennison AR. History, ethics, advantages and limitations of experimental models for hepatic ablation. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;14:147–154. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i2.147. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Baumans V. Use of animals in experimental research: an ethical dilemma? Gene Ther. 2004;1:64–66. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.gt.3302371. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Folescu R, Miftode E, Zamfir CL. Animal experimental studies: controversies, alternatives and perspectives. Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala. 2013;4:266–273.
-
- Gershoff SN. Animal experimentation--a personal view. Nutr Rev. 2009;67:95–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-4887.2008.00144.x. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Taylor K, Gordon N, Langley G, Higgins W. Estimates for worldwide laboratory animal use in 2005. Altern Lab Anim. 2008;36:327–342. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials