Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2016 Dec;11(4):421-426.
doi: 10.1177/1558944716628485. Epub 2016 Mar 8.

Comparison of Dorsal Plate Fixation Versus Intramedullary Headless Screw Fixation of Unstable Metacarpal Shaft Fractures: A Biomechanical Study

Eitan Melamed  1 , Richard M Hinds  1 , Michael B Gottschalk  1 , Oran D Kennedy  1 , John T Capo  1
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of Dorsal Plate Fixation Versus Intramedullary Headless Screw Fixation of Unstable Metacarpal Shaft Fractures: A Biomechanical Study

Eitan Melamed et al. Hand (N Y). 2016 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Recently, intramedullary headless screw (IMHS) has shown promise as an alternative to dorsal plate fixation of metacarpal fractures. The purpose of this study was to assess the biomechanical performance of IMHS versus plating. We hypothesized that IMHS fixation provides inferior stability to plating. Methods: Metacarpal fracture model with 3-mm of volar gapping in forty-four human cadaveric metacarpals was created. The specimens were divided into 5 groups: Group 1, 1.5-mm non-locking plate; Group 2, 1.5-mm locking plate; Group 3, 2.0-mm non-locking plate; Group 4, 2.0-mm locking plate; and Group 5, 2.4-mm short cannulated IMHS. A 4-point bending model was used to assess load-to failure (LTF) and stiffness. Results: Mean LTF was 364 ± 130 N for 1.5-mm non-locking plates, 218 ± 94 N for 1.5-mm locking plates, 421 ± 86 N for 2.0-mm non-locking plates, 351 ± 71 N for 2.0-mm locking plates, and 75 ± 20 N for IMHS. Mean stiffness was 91 ± 12 N/mm for 1.5-mm non-locking plates, 110 ± 77 N/mm for 1.5-mm locking plates, 94 ± 20 N/mm for 2.0-mm non-locking plates, 135 ± 16 N/mm for 2.0-mm locking plates, and 55 ± 15 N/mm for IMHS. IMHS demonstrated significantly lower LTF and stiffness than plates. Conclusions: IMHS fixation of unstable metacarpal shaft fractures offers less stability compared to plating when loaded in bending. The LTF and stiffness of IMHS versus plating of metacarpal shaft fractures has not been previously quantified. Our results reveal that IMHS fixation is less favorable biomechanically and should be carefully chosen in regards to fracture stability.

Keywords: biomechanical; fracture; intramedullary; metacarpal; stiffness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: J.T.C. is on the Speakers Bureau for Integra Life Sciences and is a consultant for Wright Medical Technology.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
A 2.0-mm nonlocking plate construct positioned for testing in the biomechanical jig.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Example of a typical load versus displacement graph. Note. LTF was defined a marked change in the load versus displacement curve as indicated in this figure. Stiffness was determined from the slope of the elastic region of the load versus displacement curve. LTF, load to failure.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
(a) 1.5-mm nonlocking plate constructs, (b) 1.5-mm locking plate constructs, (c) 2.0-mm nonlocking plate constructs, (d) 2.0-mm locking plate constructs, and (e) 2.4-mm intramedullary headless screws after biomechanical testing to failure. Note. Values are displayed as mean and standard deviation. IMHS, intramedullary headless screw.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Chart displaying load-to-failure data. Note. Values are displayed as mean and standard deviation. IMHS, intramedullary headless screw.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Chart displaying stiffness data. Note. Values are displayed as mean and standard deviation. IMHS, intramedullary headless screw.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Afshar R, Fong TS, Latifi MH, Kanthan SR, Kamarul T. A biomechanical study comparing plate fixation using unicortical and bicortical screws in transverse metacarpal fracture models subjected to cyclic loading. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2012;37(5):396-401. - PubMed
    1. Black D, Mann RJ, Constine R, Daniels AU. Comparison of internal fixation techniques in metacarpal fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 1985;10(4):466-472. - PubMed
    1. Boulton CL, Salzler M, Mudgal CS. Intramedullary cannulated headless screw fixation of a comminuted subcapital metacarpal fracture: case report. J Hand Surg Am. 2010;35(8):1260-1263. - PubMed
    1. Bozic KJ, Perez LE, Wilson DR, Fitzgibbons PG, Jupiter JB. Mechanical testing of bioresorbable implants for use in metacarpal fracture fixation. J Hand Surg Am. 2001;26(4):755-761. - PubMed
    1. Doht S, Jansen H, Meffert R, Frey S. Higher stability with locking plates in hand surgery? biomechanical investigation of the TriLock system in a fracture model. Int Orthop. 2012;36(8):1641-1646. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources