Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2017 Sep;28(9):1367-1376.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3273-z. Epub 2017 Feb 1.

A UK questionnaire survey of current techniques used to perform pelvic organ prolapse repair

Emily Fairclough  1   2 , Jenny Myers  1   2 , Anthony Ross Broadhurst Smith  1   2 , Suzanne Breeman  3 , Fiona Reid  4   5
Affiliations
Multicenter Study

A UK questionnaire survey of current techniques used to perform pelvic organ prolapse repair

Emily Fairclough et al. Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Sep.

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: Evidence-based medicine should result in better standardisation of practice. This study aims to evaluate whether there remains variation in surgical techniques in native tissue and graft/mesh repairs of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in UK practice.

Methods: A questionnaire survey was conducted to describe current surgical techniques for native tissue and graft/mesh POP repairs performed by a cohort of UK surgeons recruiting to a large multicentre prolapse trial (PROSPECT).

Results: The questionnaire return rate was 90% (n = 56 out of 62). Substantial variations in surgical techniques were seen at every step of the procedure. Native tissue repair: most surgeons used infiltration, 95% (n = 53 out of 56), but the volume used varied (10-80 ml). All but one surgeon performed a midline incision; this surgeon performed an elliptical incision. The depth of tissue dissection varied, being both above and below the vaginal muscularis (fascia). Fascial repair methods included midline, closure of separate fascial defects, paravaginal repair and rectal/levator plication. Graft/mesh repairs: many different products and manufacturers were used. There was variation in the method of attachment of graft/mesh inserts and their placement in relation to the fascia. For both native tissue and graft/mesh repairs, the method of fascial dissection, suturing methods and suture material varied. Most surgeons inserted a pack, 91% (n = 50 out of 55), soaked in varying substances before use.

Conclusions: There is considerable variation between UK-based surgeons in the surgical techniques used to perform both native tissue and graft/mesh-augmented POP repairs. Further research is required to determine whether these differences influence outcome.

Keywords: Graft; Mesh; Native tissue; Pelvic organ prolapse; Surgical technique.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

References

    1. Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, et al. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:501–506. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00058-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Weber AM, Walters MD, Piedmonte MR, Ballard LA. Anterior colporrhaphy: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:1299–1306. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.119081. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jha S, Moran P. The UK national prolapse survey: 5 years on. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2011;22:517–528. doi: 10.1007/s00192-011-1379-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, Haya N, Marjoribanks J. Transvaginal mesh or grafts compared with native tissue repair for vaginal prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;9(2) - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tawfeek S, Barrington J. How are anterior repairs carried out in the UK? J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;26:650–655. doi: 10.1080/01443610600913809. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources