Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun;32(6):626-631.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-3982-5. Epub 2017 Feb 1.

Physician and Patient Views on Public Physician Rating Websites: A Cross-Sectional Study

Affiliations

Physician and Patient Views on Public Physician Rating Websites: A Cross-Sectional Study

Alison M Holliday et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Numerical ratings and narrative comments about physicians are increasingly available online. These physician rating websites include independent websites reporting crowd-sourced data from online users and health systems reporting data from their internal patient experience surveys.

Objective: To assess patient and physician views on physician rating websites.

Design: Cross-sectional physician (electronic) and patient (paper) surveys conducted in August 2015.

Participants: Eight hundred twenty-eight physicians (response rate 43%) affiliated with one of four hospitals in a large accountable care organization in eastern Massachusetts; 494 adult patients (response rate 34%) who received care in this system in May 2015.

Main measures: Use and perceptions of physician rating websites.

Key results: Fifty-three percent of physicians and 39% of patients reported visiting a physician rating website at least once. Physicians reported higher levels of agreement with the accuracy of numerical data (53%) and narrative comments (62%) from health system patient experience surveys compared to numerical data (36%) and narrative comments (36%) on independent websites. Patients reported higher levels of agreement with trusting the accuracy of data obtained from independent websites (57%) compared to health system patient experience surveys (45%). Twenty-one percent of physicians and 51% of patients supported posting narrative comments online for all consumers. The majority (78%) of physicians believed that posting narrative comments online would increase physician job stress; smaller proportions perceived a negative effect on the physician-patient relationship (46%), health care overuse (34%), and patient-reported experiences of care (33%). Over one-fourth of patients (29%) believed that posting narrative comments would cause them to be less open.

Conclusions: Physicians and patients have different views on whether independent or health system physician rating websites are the more reliable source of information. Their views on whether such data should be shared on public websites are also discordant.

Keywords: consumer health; doctor–patient relationships; patient engagement; patient satisfaction; quality improvement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Physician and patient support for sharing physician rating data. Physician and patient ratings indicating very strong or somewhat strong support for sharing of data collected on health system patient experience surveys.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hanauer DA, Zheng K, Singer DC, Gebremariam A, Davis M. Public awareness, perception, and use of online physician rating sites. JAMA. 2014;311(7):734–5. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.283194. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Emmert M, Sander U, Pisch F. Eight questions about physician-rating websites: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(2):e24. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2360. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lee TH. Online Reviews Could Help Fix Medicine. Har Bus Rev. June 3, 2014. Available at: https://hbr.org/2014/06/online-reviews-could-help-fix-medicine/. Accessed December 20, 2016
    1. Lagu T, Hannon NS, Rothberg MB, Lindenauer PK. Patients’ evaluations of health care providers in the era of social networking. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(9):942–946. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1383-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anhang Price R, Elliott MN, Zaslavsky AM, et al. Examining the role of patient experience surveys in measuring health care quality. Med Care Res Rev. 2014;71(5):522–54. doi: 10.1177/1077558714541480. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources