Physician and Patient Views on Public Physician Rating Websites: A Cross-Sectional Study
- PMID: 28150098
- PMCID: PMC5442010
- DOI: 10.1007/s11606-017-3982-5
Physician and Patient Views on Public Physician Rating Websites: A Cross-Sectional Study
Abstract
Background: Numerical ratings and narrative comments about physicians are increasingly available online. These physician rating websites include independent websites reporting crowd-sourced data from online users and health systems reporting data from their internal patient experience surveys.
Objective: To assess patient and physician views on physician rating websites.
Design: Cross-sectional physician (electronic) and patient (paper) surveys conducted in August 2015.
Participants: Eight hundred twenty-eight physicians (response rate 43%) affiliated with one of four hospitals in a large accountable care organization in eastern Massachusetts; 494 adult patients (response rate 34%) who received care in this system in May 2015.
Main measures: Use and perceptions of physician rating websites.
Key results: Fifty-three percent of physicians and 39% of patients reported visiting a physician rating website at least once. Physicians reported higher levels of agreement with the accuracy of numerical data (53%) and narrative comments (62%) from health system patient experience surveys compared to numerical data (36%) and narrative comments (36%) on independent websites. Patients reported higher levels of agreement with trusting the accuracy of data obtained from independent websites (57%) compared to health system patient experience surveys (45%). Twenty-one percent of physicians and 51% of patients supported posting narrative comments online for all consumers. The majority (78%) of physicians believed that posting narrative comments online would increase physician job stress; smaller proportions perceived a negative effect on the physician-patient relationship (46%), health care overuse (34%), and patient-reported experiences of care (33%). Over one-fourth of patients (29%) believed that posting narrative comments would cause them to be less open.
Conclusions: Physicians and patients have different views on whether independent or health system physician rating websites are the more reliable source of information. Their views on whether such data should be shared on public websites are also discordant.
Keywords: consumer health; doctor–patient relationships; patient engagement; patient satisfaction; quality improvement.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.
Figures
Comment in
-
Consider Embracing the Reviews from Physician Rating Websites.J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Jun;32(6):599-600. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4036-8. J Gen Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 28299603 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Sources of traffic and visitors' preferences regarding online public reports of quality: web analytics and online survey results.J Med Internet Res. 2015 May 1;17(5):e102. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3637. J Med Internet Res. 2015. PMID: 25934100 Free PMC article.
-
Physician Rating Websites: What Aspects Are Important to Identify a Good Doctor, and Are Patients Capable of Assessing Them? A Mixed-Methods Approach Including Physicians' and Health Care Consumers' Perspectives.J Med Internet Res. 2017 May 1;19(5):e127. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6875. J Med Internet Res. 2017. PMID: 28461285 Free PMC article.
-
Quantitative Ratings and Narrative Comments on Swiss Physician Rating Websites: Frequency Analysis.J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jul 26;21(7):e13816. doi: 10.2196/13816. J Med Internet Res. 2019. PMID: 31350838 Free PMC article.
-
Popularity of internet physician rating sites and their apparent influence on patients' choices of physicians.BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Sep 26;15:416. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1099-2. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015. PMID: 26410383 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Data Quality Issues With Physician-Rating Websites: Systematic Review.J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 28;22(9):e15916. doi: 10.2196/15916. J Med Internet Res. 2020. PMID: 32986000 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Assessing extremely negative online patient reviews and complaints of musculoskeletal oncology surgeons in the United States: a retrospective analysis.J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Jul 23;19(1):425. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04881-y. J Orthop Surg Res. 2024. PMID: 39044200 Free PMC article.
-
The Impact of Web-Based Ratings on Patient Choice of a Primary Care Physician Versus a Specialist: Randomized Controlled Experiment.J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jun 28;21(6):e11188. doi: 10.2196/11188. J Med Internet Res. 2019. PMID: 31254337 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Reporting of Patient Experience Data on Health Systems' Websites and Commercial Physician-Rating Websites: Mixed-Methods Analysis.J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 27;21(3):e12007. doi: 10.2196/12007. J Med Internet Res. 2019. PMID: 30916654 Free PMC article.
-
Do Physicians Respond to Web-Based Patient Ratings? An Analysis of Physicians' Responses to More Than One Million Web-Based Ratings Over a Six-Year Period.J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jul 26;19(7):e275. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7538. J Med Internet Res. 2017. PMID: 28747292 Free PMC article.
-
Differences in Online Consumer Ratings of Health Care Providers Across Medical, Surgical, and Allied Health Specialties: Observational Study of 212,933 Providers.J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 9;20(5):e176. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9160. J Med Internet Res. 2018. PMID: 29743150 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Lee TH. Online Reviews Could Help Fix Medicine. Har Bus Rev. June 3, 2014. Available at: https://hbr.org/2014/06/online-reviews-could-help-fix-medicine/. Accessed December 20, 2016
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources