Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2016 Nov 15;22(22):5419-5427.
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0625.

Progress and Paradigms in Multiple Myeloma

Affiliations
Editorial

Progress and Paradigms in Multiple Myeloma

Kenneth C Anderson. Clin Cancer Res. .

Abstract

Remarkable progress has been achieved in multiple myeloma, and patient median survival has been extended 3- to 4-fold. Specifically, there have been 18 newly approved treatments for multiple myeloma in the past 12 years, including seven in 2015, and the treatment paradigm and patient outcome have been transformed. The definition of patients benefitting from these therapies has been broadened. Response criteria now include minimal residual disease (MRD), assessed in bone marrow by multicolor flow cytometry or sequencing, and by imaging for extramedullary disease. Initial therapy for transplant candidates is a triplet incorporating novel therapies-that is, lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone or cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone. Lenalidomide maintenance until progression can prolong progression-free and overall survival in standard-risk multiple myeloma, with incorporation of proteasome inhibitor for high-risk disease. Studies are evaluating the value of early versus late transplant and MRD as a therapeutic goal to inform therapy. In nontransplant patients, triplet therapies are also preferred, with doublet therapy reserved for frail patients, and maintenance as described above. The availability of second-generation proteasome inhibitors (carfilzomib and ixazomib), immunomodulatory drugs (pomalidomide), histone deacetylase inhibitors (panobinostat), and monoclonal antibodies (elotuzumab and daratumumab) allows for effective combination therapies of relapsed disease as well. Finally, novel therapies targeting protein degradation, restoring autologous memory anti-multiple myeloma immunity, and exploiting genetic vulnerabilities show promise to improve patient outcome even further. Clin Cancer Res; 22(22); 5419-27. ©2016 AACR SEE ALL ARTICLES IN THIS CCR FOCUS SECTION, "MULTIPLE MYELOMA MULTIPLYING THERAPIES".

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Bench to Bedside Translation of Novel Agents in Myeloma
Early advances in myeloma therapy included melphalan and prednisone, followed by combination chemotherapy and then high dose melphalan, rescued first by bone marrow and more recently by peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Importantly, remarkable progress has been made in the last twelve years due to the FDA approval of proteasome inhibitors bortezomib, carfilzomib, and ixazomib; immunomodulatory drugs thalidomide, lenalidomide, and pomalidomide; histone deacetylase inhibitor panobinostat; as well as monoclonal antibodies elotuzumab and daratumumab (left). All these recent therapies have been initially evaluated and achieved responses in relapsed refractory MM, and then moved into clinical trials earlier in the disease course where their efficacy improves. Moreover, their use in combination, ie lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone, can achieve unprecedented frequency and extent of response when used as initial therapy. They have been integrated into the treatment paradigm of transplant candidates and non-transplant candidates as initial and as maintenance therapies. As a consequence of these advances, overall survival has been extended from a median of 3 to 8–10 years (4), and the benefit of most recently approved drugs will further improve outcome (right).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Restoring Apoptotic Signaling By Serine Threonine Kinase Inhibiton in YAP1-Deficient Multiple Myeloma
A subset of patients with myeloma, lymphoma, and leukemia have decreased copy number and expression of YAP1 (37). As a result, these tumor cells with ongoing DNA damage do not undergo apoptosis (left). Serine threonine kinase (STK) 4 inhibits expression of YAP1; conversely, genetic or pharmacologic inhibition of STK4 allows re-expression of YAP1 and downstream p73-mediated apoptosis of these tumor cells with ongoing DNA damage to occur (right). Adapted from ref. 37.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Targeting Ubiquitin Proteasome System
Multiple proteasome inhibitors including bortezomib, carfilzomib, ixazomib, and opromazib primarily inhibit the chymotryptic-like proteasome activity, whereas marizomib inhibits chymotryptic-, tryptic-, and caspase-like activities. In the ubiquitin-proteasome cascade of protein degradation, ubiquitin proteasome receptors and deubiquitylating enzymes are upstream of the proteasome and required for recruiting and deubiquitylating ubiquitylated misfolded proteins, respectively, so that they can bind to the 20S core of the proteasome and be degraded. Blockade of either ubiquitin proteasome receptors and deubiquitylating enzymes upstream of the proteasome therefore has the potential to overcome proteasome inhibitor resistance.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Monoclonal Antibody-Based Therapies for Multiple Myeloma
Monoclonal antibodies used therapeutically in MM can trigger antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, complement-dependent cytotoxicity, block signaling pathways mediating MM cell growth, survival, and drug resistance, or trigger apoptotic signaling cascades. Clinically FDA approved monoclonal antibodies daratumumab and elotuzumab target CD38 and SLAMF-7, respectively. Adapted from ref. 93. © 2011 Yu-Tzu Tai and Kenneth C. Anderson. Published by Hindawi. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The article in which the original figure appeared is published with open access at http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/924058.

References

    1. Palumbo A, Anderson K. Multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1046–60. - PubMed
    1. Anderson KC. The 39th David A. Karnofsky Lecture: bench-to-bedside translation of targeted therapies in multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:445–52. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anderson KC, Alsina M, Atanackovic D, Biermann JS, Chandler JC, Costello C, et al. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Multiple Myeloma, Version 3.2016. J Natl Compr Canc Network. 2016;14:389–400. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kumar SK, Dispenzieri A, Lacy MQ, Gertz MA, Buadi FK, Pandey S, et al. Continued improvement in survival in multiple myeloma: changes in early mortality and outcomes in older patients. Leukemia. 2014;28:1122–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Landgren O, Rajkumar SV. New developments in diagnosis, prognosis, and assessment of response in multiple myeloma. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22:xxxx–xxxx. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances