Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2017 Feb 2;12(2):e0170811.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170811. eCollection 2017.

Validity of the Manchester Triage System in emergency care: A prospective observational study

Affiliations
Observational Study

Validity of the Manchester Triage System in emergency care: A prospective observational study

Joany M Zachariasse et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the validity of the Manchester Triage System (MTS) in emergency care for the general population of patients attending the emergency department, for children and elderly, and for commonly used MTS flowcharts and discriminators across three different emergency care settings.

Methods: This was a prospective observational study in three European emergency departments. All consecutive patients attending the emergency department during a 1-year study period (2010-2012) were included. Validity of the MTS was assessed by comparing MTS urgency as determined by triage nurses with patient urgency according to a predefined 3-category reference standard as proxy for true patient urgency.

Results: 288,663 patients were included in the analysis. Sensitivity of the MTS in the three hospitals ranged from 0.47 (95%CI 0.44-0.49) to 0.87 (95%CI 0.85-0.90), and specificity from 0.84 (95%CI 0.84-0.84) to 0.94 (95%CI 0.94-0.94) for the triage of adult patients. In children, sensitivity ranged from 0.65 (95%CI 0.61-0.70) to 0.83 (95%CI 0.79-0.87), and specificity from 0.83 (95%CI 0.82-0.83) to 0.89 (95%CI 0.88-0.90). The diagnostic odds ratio ranged from 13.5 (95%CI 12.1-15.0) to 35.3 (95%CI 28.4-43.9) in adults and from 9.8 (95%CI 6.7-14.5) to 23.8 (95%CI 17.7-32.0) in children, and was lowest in the youngest patients in 2 out of 3 settings and in the oldest patients in all settings. Performance varied considerably between the different emergency departments.

Conclusions: Validity of the MTS in emergency care is moderate to good, with lowest performance in the young and elderly patients. Future studies on the validity of triage systems should be restricted to large, multicenter studies to define modifications and improve generalizability of the findings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Performance of the MTS in different age groups.
A) percentages under-, over-, and correct triage; B) diagnostic odds ratio’s.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Performance of most commonly used MTS flowcharts.
A) Percentages under-, over-, and correct triage; B) Diagnostic odds ratio’s.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Performance of most commonly used MTS discriminators.
A) Percentages under-, over-, and correct triage; B) Diagnostic odds ratio’s.

References

    1. FitzGerald G, Jelinek GA, Scott D, Gerdtz MF. Emergency department triage revisited. Emerg Med J. 2010;27(2):86–92. 10.1136/emj.2009.077081 - DOI - PubMed
    1. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Pediatric Emergency Medicine. Overcrowding crisis in our nation's emergency departments: is our safety net unraveling? Pediatrics. 2004;114(3):878–88. 10.1542/peds.2004-1287 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Institute Of Medicine. IOM report: the future of emergency care in the United States health system. Acad Emerg Med. 2006;13(10):1081–5. 10.1197/j.aem.2006.07.011 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Australasian College for Emergency Medicine. Access Block and Overcrowding in Emergency departments. 2004.
    1. NHS England. Transforming urgent and emergency care services in England—Urgent and Emergency Care Review. 2013.

Publication types

MeSH terms