Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Feb 2;12(2):e0170843.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170843. eCollection 2017.

Exome sequencing covers >98% of mutations identified on targeted next generation sequencing panels

Affiliations

Exome sequencing covers >98% of mutations identified on targeted next generation sequencing panels

Holly LaDuca et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: With the expanded availability of next generation sequencing (NGS)-based clinical genetic tests, clinicians seeking to test patients with Mendelian diseases must weigh the superior coverage of targeted gene panels with the greater number of genes included in whole exome sequencing (WES) when considering their first-tier testing approach. Here, we use an in silico analysis to predict the analytic sensitivity of WES using pathogenic variants identified on targeted NGS panels as a reference.

Methods: Corresponding nucleotide positions for 1533 different alterations classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic identified on targeted NGS multi-gene panel tests in our laboratory were interrogated in data from 100 randomly-selected clinical WES samples to quantify the sequence coverage at each position. Pathogenic variants represented 91 genes implicated in hereditary cancer, X-linked intellectual disability, primary ciliary dyskinesia, Marfan syndrome/aortic aneurysms, cardiomyopathies and arrhythmias.

Results: When assessing coverage among 100 individual WES samples for each pathogenic variant (153,300 individual assessments), 99.7% (n = 152,798) would likely have been detected on WES. All pathogenic variants had at least some coverage on exome sequencing, with a total of 97.3% (n = 1491) detectable across all 100 individuals. For the remaining 42 pathogenic variants, the number of WES samples with adequate coverage ranged from 35 to 99. Factors such as location in GC-rich, repetitive, or homologous regions likely explain why some of these alterations were not detected across all samples. To validate study findings, a similar analysis was performed against coverage data from 60,706 exomes available through the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC). Results from this validation confirmed that 98.6% (91,743,296/93,062,298) of pathogenic variants demonstrated adequate depth for detection.

Conclusions: Results from this in silico analysis suggest that exome sequencing may achieve a diagnostic yield similar to panel-based testing for Mendelian diseases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors were full time paid employees of Ambry Genetics at the time the study was conducted. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

References

    1. Rehm HL. Disease-targeted sequencing: a cornerstone in the clinic. Nature reviews Genetics. 2013;14(4):295–300. 10.1038/nrg3463 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Asan, Xu Y, Jiang H, Tyler-Smith C, Xue Y, Jiang T, et al. Comprehensive comparison of three commercial human whole-exome capture platforms. Genome biology. 2011;12(9):R95 10.1186/gb-2011-12-9-r95 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Biesecker LG, Green RC. Diagnostic clinical genome and exome sequencing. The New England journal of medicine. 2014;371(12):1170. - PubMed
    1. Chilamakuri CS, Lorenz S, Madoui MA, Vodak D, Sun J, Hovig E, et al. Performance comparison of four exome capture systems for deep sequencing. BMC genomics. 2014;15:449 10.1186/1471-2164-15-449 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clark MJ, Chen R, Lam HY, Karczewski KJ, Chen R, Euskirchen G, et al. Performance comparison of exome DNA sequencing technologies. Nature biotechnology. 2011;29(10):908–14. 10.1038/nbt.1975 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms