Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2017 May;65(5):937-948.
doi: 10.1111/jgs.14713. Epub 2017 Feb 2.

Depression Case Finding in Individuals with Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Depression Case Finding in Individuals with Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Zahra S Goodarzi et al. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 May.

Erratum in

  • Erratum.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Jul;66(7):1441. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15407. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018. PMID: 30117570 No abstract available.

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of depression case finding tools with a criterion standard in the outpatient setting among adults with dementia.

Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Setting: Studies of older outpatients with dementia.

Participants: Elderly outpatients (clinic and long-term care) with dementia (N = 3,035).

Measurements: Prevalence of major depression and diagnostic accuracy measures including sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios.

Results: From the 11,539 citations, 20 studies were included for qualitative synthesis and 15 for a meta-analysis. Tools included were the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD), Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), Single Question, Nijmegen Observer-Rated Depression Scale, and Even Briefer Assessment Scale-Depression. The pooled prevalence of depression in individuals with dementia was 30.3% (95% CI = 22.1-38.5). The average age was 75.2 (95% CI = 71.7-78.7), and mean Mini-Mental State Examination scores ranged from 11.2 to 24. The diagnostic accuracy of the individual tools was pooled for the best-reported cutoffs and for each cutoff, if available. The CSDD had a sensitivity of 0.84 (95% CI = 0.73-0.91) and a specificity of 0.80 (95% CI = 0.65-0.90), the 30-item GDS (GDS-30) had a sensitivity of 0.62 (95% CI = 0.45-0.76) and a specificity 0.81 (95% CI = 0.75-0.85), and the HDRS had a sensitivity of 0.86 (95% CI = 0.63-0.96) and a specificity of 0.84 (95% CI = 0.76-0.90). Summary statistics for all tools across best-reported cutoffs had significant heterogeneity.

Conclusion: There are many validated tools for the detection of depression in individuals with dementia. Tools that incorporate a physician interview with patient and collateral histories, the CSDD and HDRS, have higher sensitivities, which would ensure fewer false-negatives.

Keywords: dementia; depression; detection; diagnostic test accuracy.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources