Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Oct;20(5):952-960.
doi: 10.1111/hex.12536. Epub 2017 Feb 2.

The complexity of shaping self-management in daily practice

Hester M van de Bovenkamp  1 , Jolanda Dwarswaard  2
Affiliations

The complexity of shaping self-management in daily practice

Hester M van de Bovenkamp et al. Health Expect. 2017 Oct.

Abstract

Background and context: Many countries are giving patients a more active role in health care, on both the individual and collective level. This study focuses on one aspect of the participation agenda on the individual level: self-management. The study explores self-management in practice, including the implications of the difficulties encountered.

Objective: To gain insight into the complexity of self-management practice. This is crucial for developing both self-management interventions and the participation policy agenda.

Methods: Qualitative semi-structured interviews with experts (n=6) and patients with a chronic condition (n=20).

Results: In terms of level of involvement and type of activity, shaping self-management in practice depends on personal and social dynamics, patients' ideas of the good life and their interactions with care professionals. Clashes can arise when patients and professionals hold differing ideas, based on different values, about the level and type of patient involvement.

Discussion: The discussion on self-management should account for the fact that how we define self-management is very much a normative issue. It depends on the norms and values of patients, professionals and underlying health-care policies. Differing ideas present professionals with ethical dilemmas which they should reflect on. However, professional reflection alone is not enough to deal with these dilemmas. The participation agenda needs far wider ranging reflection on how participation relates to other values in health care.

Keywords: autonomy; ethics; patient participation; qualitative research; self-management.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Dwarswaard J, van de Bovenkamp H. Self‐management support: a qualitative study of ethical dilemmas experienced by nurses. Patient Educ Couns. 2015;98:1131–1136. - PubMed
    1. Kendall E, Ehrlich C, Sunderland N, Muenchberger H, Rushton C. Self‐managing versus self‐management: reinvigorating the socio‐political dimensions of self‐management. Chronic Illn. 2011;7:87–98. - PubMed
    1. Ong BN, Rogers A, Kennedy A, et al. Behaviour change and social blinkers? The role of sociology in trials of self‐management behaviour in chronic conditions. Sociol Health Illn. 2014;36:226–238. - PubMed
    1. Van de Bovenkamp HM, Trappenburg M, Grit K. Patient Participation in collective healthcare decision making: the Dutch model. Health Expect. 2010;13:73–85. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dwarswaard J, Bakker E, Van Staa AL, Boeije H. Self‐management support from the perspective of patients with a chronic condition: a thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. Health Expect. 2016;19:194–208. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types