Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Feb 2:14:E10.
doi: 10.5888/pcd14.160292.

Comparison of Research Framing Preferences and Information Use of State Legislators and Advocates Involved in Cancer Control, United States, 2012-2013

Alexandra B Morshed  1 , Elizabeth A Dodson  2 , Rachel G Tabak  2 , Ross C Brownson  2   3
Affiliations

Comparison of Research Framing Preferences and Information Use of State Legislators and Advocates Involved in Cancer Control, United States, 2012-2013

Alexandra B Morshed et al. Prev Chronic Dis. .

Abstract

Introduction: Evidence-based policy plays an important role in prevention of cancer and other chronic diseases. The needs of actors involved in policy decision-making should inform knowledge translation strategies. This study examines the differences between state legislators and advocates in how they seek and use information and what their preferences are for how research information is framed.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional comparison of survey responses by US advocates (n = 77) and state legislators (n = 265) working on issues related to cancer control.

Results: Advocates differed significantly from legislators on all demographic characteristics. Advocates reported seeking and using information more frequently than legislators, though legislators used legislative research bureaus more often (0.45 point difference, P = .004). Both legislators and advocates prioritized the presentation and timeliness of research information similarly but reported different preferences for source (information bias, information relevance, delivery of information by trusted person) of research information. Several differences between advocates and legislators were modified by participant age.

Conclusion: Our study provides insights for development of knowledge translation strategies to enhance evidence-based policy making for cancer control that are tailored to state-level legislators and advocates. Additional research efforts should evaluate the effectiveness of such knowledge translation strategies, particularly among advocates.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Kopakka R; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Ten great public health achievements—worldwide, 2001-2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2011;60(24):814–8. - PubMed
    1. Brownson RC, Chriqui JF, Stamatakis KA. Understanding evidence-based public health policy. Am J Public Health 2009;99(9):1576–83. 10.2105/AJPH.2008.156224 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hartsfield D, Moulton AD, McKie KL. A review of model public health laws. Am J Public Health 2007;97(Suppl 1):S56–61. 10.2105/AJPH.2005.082057 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gollust SE, Kite HA, Benning SJ, Callanan RA, Weisman SR, Nanney MS. Use of research evidence in state policymaking for childhood obesity prevention in Minnesota. Am J Public Health 2014;104(10):1894–900. 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302137 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zahariadis N. Ambiguity and multiple streams. In: Weible CM, Sabatier PA, editors. Theories of the policy process. Cambridge (MA): Westview Press; 2014.

Publication types