Outcomes of Physician-Staffed Versus Non-Physician-Staffed Helicopter Transport for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction
- PMID: 28154162
- PMCID: PMC5523778
- DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.116.004936
Outcomes of Physician-Staffed Versus Non-Physician-Staffed Helicopter Transport for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Abstract
Background: The effect of physician-staffed helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) on ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patient transfer is unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the characteristics and outcomes of physician-staffed HEMS (Physician-HEMS) versus non-physician-staffed (Standard-HEMS) in patients with STEMI.
Methods and results: We studied 398 STEMI patients transferred by either Physician-HEMS (n=327) or Standard-HEMS (n=71) for primary or rescue percutaneous coronary intervention at 2 hospitals between 2006 and 2014. Data were collected from electronic medical records and each institution's contribution to the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Median electrocardiogram-to-balloon time was longer for the Standard-HEMS group than for the Physician-HEMS group (118 vs 107 minutes; P=0.002). The Standard-HEMS group was more likely than the Physician-HEMS group to receive nitroglycerin (37% vs 15%; P<0.001) and opioid analgesics (42.3% vs 21.7%; P<0.001) during transport. In-hospital adverse outcomes, including cardiac arrest, cardiogenic shock, and serious arrhythmias, were more common in the Standard-HEMS group (25.4% vs 11.3%; P=0.002). After adjusting for age, sex, Killip class, and transport time, patients transferred by Standard-HEMS had increased risk of any serious in-hospital adverse event (odds ratio=2.91; 95% CI=1.39-6.06; P=0.004). In-hospital mortality was not statistically different between the 2 groups (9.9% in the Standard-HEMS group vs 4.9% in the Physician-HEMS group; P=0.104).
Conclusions: Patients with STEMI transported by Standard-HEMS had longer transport times, higher rates of nitroglycerin and opioid administration, and higher rates of adjusted in-hospital events. Efforts to better understand optimal transport strategies in STEMI patients are needed.
Keywords: ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction; acute myocardial infarction; outcome; percutaneous coronary intervention; treatment.
© 2017 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley Blackwell.
Similar articles
-
Helicopter vs. ground transportation of patients bound for primary percutaneous coronary intervention.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2018 Apr;62(4):568-578. doi: 10.1111/aas.13092. Epub 2018 Feb 27. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2018. PMID: 29484640 Free PMC article.
-
Emergency management of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in Eastern Austria: a descriptive quality control study.Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018 May 9;26(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s13049-018-0504-3. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018. PMID: 29739432 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of physician-staffed helicopter with ground-based emergency medical services for trauma patients.Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Jul;45:75-79. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.02.062. Epub 2021 Mar 1. Am J Emerg Med. 2021. PMID: 33676079
-
The cost-effectiveness of physician staffed Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS) transport to a major trauma centre in NSW, Australia.Injury. 2012 Nov;43(11):1843-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.07.184. Epub 2012 Aug 13. Injury. 2012. PMID: 22898559 Review.
-
The Value of Physicians as Part of a Helicopter Emergency Medical Services Crew: A Review.Air Med J. 2023 Nov-Dec;42(6):477-482. doi: 10.1016/j.amj.2023.07.001. Epub 2023 Jul 23. Air Med J. 2023. PMID: 37996186 Review.
Cited by
-
A physician-staffed ground emergency medical service does not significantly shorten door-to-balloon time in patients with STEMI: an observational study in a single emergency center in Japan.Acute Med Surg. 2020 Jul 15;7(1):e542. doi: 10.1002/ams2.542. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec. Acute Med Surg. 2020. PMID: 32685177 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials. Lancet. 2003;361:13–20. - PubMed
-
- Blankenship JC, Skelding KA, Scott TD, Berger PB, Parise H, Brodie BR, Witzenbichler B, Gaugliumi G, Peruga JZ, Lansky AJ, Mehran R, Stone GW. Predictors of reperfusion delay in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention from the HORIZONS‐AMI trial. Am J Cardiol. 2010;106:1527–1533. - PubMed
-
- Jacobs AK, Antman EM, Faxon DP, Gregory T, Solis P. Development of systems of care for ST‐elevation myocardial infarction patients: executive summary. Circulation. 2007;116:217–230. - PubMed
-
- Mathews R, Peterson ED, Li S, Roe MT, Glickman SW, Wiviott SD, Saucedo JF, Antman EM, Jacobs AK, Wang TY. Use of emergency medical service transport among patients with ST‐segment‐elevation myocardial infarction: findings from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Acute Coronary Treatment Intervention Outcomes Network Registry‐Get With The Guidelines. Circulation. 2011;124:154–163. - PubMed
-
- O'Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, Casey DE, Chung MK, de Lemos JA, Ettinger SM, Fang JC, Fesmire FM, Franklin BA, Granger CB, Krumholz HM, Linderbaum JA, Morrow DA, Newby LK, Ornato JP, Ou N, Radford MJ, Tamis‐Holland JE, Tommaso CL, Tracy CM, Woo YJ, Zhao DX, Anderson JL, Jacobs AK, Halperin JL, Albert NM, Brindis RG, Creager MA, DeMets D, Guyton RA, Hochman JS, Kovacs RJ, Kushner FG, Ohman EM, Stevenson WG, Yancy CW. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST‐elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2013;127:e362–e425. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical