Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov 9;6(11):e013246.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013246.

Prevalence and risk factors of taste and smell impairment in a nationwide representative sample of the US population: a cross-sectional study

Affiliations

Prevalence and risk factors of taste and smell impairment in a nationwide representative sample of the US population: a cross-sectional study

Gang Liu et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: To estimate the prevalence of, and explore potential risk factors for, taste and smell dysfunction in the general population of the USA.

Design: A cross-sectional study.

Setting: A cross-sectional analysis of data collected in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES 2013-2014).

Participants: A total of 3519 men and women aged 40 years and older who participated in NHANES 2013-2014.

Main outcome measures: Using the NHANES Pocket Smell Test, smell impairment was defined as failing to correctly identify 6 or more of the 8 odours. Taste impairment was defined as failing to correctly identify quinine or sodium chloride.

Results: The estimated prevalence was 13.5% for smell impairment, 17.3% for taste impairment and 2.2% for taste and smell impairment. For smell, but not taste, prevalence estimates increased with age and were higher in men and ethnic minorities. In backward stepwise logistic regression, low educational attainment, low family income and a history of asthma or cancer were independently associated with a higher prevalence of smell impairment, whereas light-to-moderate alcohol consumption (1-3 drinks/day) was associated with a lower prevalence of this condition. After multivariate adjustment, being non-Hispanic Black Americans, consuming ≥4 drinks of alcohol per day and having a history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) were independently associated with a higher prevalence of taste impairment.

Conclusions: Based on a nationally representative multistage probability survey among the US population aged 40 years and older, smell and taste dysfunction affected ∼20.5 million (13.5%) and 26.3 million (17.3%) individuals, respectively. Age, gender, ethnicity, educational attainment, family income, light-to-moderate alcohol consumption and history of asthma or cancer were significant risk factors for smell dysfunction, whereas only ethnicity, heavy alcohol consumption and CVD history were associated with a higher prevalence of taste dysfunction.

Keywords: Prevalence; Risk factors; Smell Impairment; Taste Impairment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

RLD is the president and major shareholder of Sensonics International, the manufacturer of the NHANES Pocket Smell Test.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Prevalence of smell and taste impairment according to age, sex and race/ethnicity. (A and B) The prevalence of smell and taste impairment in men and women according to each age group. (C and D) The prevalence of smell and taste impairment in different ethnicities according to each age group.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves showing the capacity of selected risk factors in predicting smell impairment in US men and women, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2013–2014. The blue curve is for the model adjusted for age, gender and ethnicity. The red curve is for the model further adjusted for family income, educational attainment, alcohol consumption and a history of asthma or cancer. The area under the ROC was 0.72 for the blue curve and 0.74 for the red curve.

References

    1. Schiffman SS, Zervakis J. Taste and smell perception in the elderly: effect of medications and disease. Adv Food Nutr Res 2002;44:247–346. 10.1016/S1043-4526(02)44006-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Landis BN, Hummel T. New evidence for high occurrence of olfactory dysfunctions within the population. Am J Med 2006;119:91–2. 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.07.039 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hummel T, Nordin S. Olfactory disorders and their consequences for quality of life. Acta Otolaryngol 2005;125:116–21. 10.1080/00016480410022787 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Santos DV, Reiter ER, DiNardo LJ et al. . Hazardous events associated with impaired olfactory function. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;130:317–19. 10.1001/archotol.130.3.317 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Doty RL, Kamath V. The influences of age on olfaction: a review. Front Psychol 2014;5:20 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00020 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms