Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Jan 7;38(2):93-100.
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw325.

Reduced blood pressure-lowering effect of catheter-based renal denervation in patients with isolated systolic hypertension: data from SYMPLICITY HTN-3 and the Global SYMPLICITY Registry

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Reduced blood pressure-lowering effect of catheter-based renal denervation in patients with isolated systolic hypertension: data from SYMPLICITY HTN-3 and the Global SYMPLICITY Registry

Felix Mahfoud et al. Eur Heart J. .

Abstract

Aims: Catheter-based renal artery denervation (RDN) has been shown to lower blood pressure (BP) in certain patients with uncontrolled hypertension. Isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) (systolic BP [SBP] ≥140 mmHg and diastolic BP <90 mmHg), characterized by increased vascular stiffness, is the predominant hypertensive phenotype in elderly patients. This study compared baseline characteristics and SBP change at 6 months between patients with ISH and combined systolic–diastolic hypertension (CH).

Methods and results: This study pooled data from 1103 patients from SYMPLICITY HTN-3 and the Global SYMPLICITY Registry. A total of 429 patients had ISH, and 674 had CH. Patients with ISH were significantly older than those with CH (66 vs. 55 years), had more type 2 diabetes mellitus (52.9 vs. 34.6%), and a lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (71.8 vs. 78.6 mL/min/1.73 m2); all P < 0.001. At 6 months, the SBP drop for CH patients was −18.7 ± 23.7 mmHg compared with a reduction of −10.9 ± 21.7 mmHg for ISH patients −7.8 mmHg, 95% confidence interval, CI, −10.5, −5.1, P < 0.001). The change in 24-h SBP at 6 months was −8.8 ± 16.2 mmHg in patients with CH vs. −5.8 ± 15.4 mmHg in ISH (−3.0 mmHg, 95% CI −5.4, −0.6, P = 0.015). Presence of ISH at baseline but not age was associated with less pronounced BP changes following the procedure. The strongest predictor of office SBP reduction at 6 months was CH, followed by aldosterone antagonist use and non-use of vasodilators.

Conclusion: The reduction in BP among patients with ISH following RDN was less pronounced than the reduction in patients with CH.

Clinical.trials.gov identifiers: NCT01534299 and NCT01418261.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Office systolic blood pressure change at 6 months. BL, baseline; CH, combined (systolic–diastolic) hypertension; GSR, Global SYMPLICITY Registry; HTN-3, SYMPLICITY HTN-3 trial; ISH, isolated systolic hypertension; RDN, catheter-based renal denervation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
24-h ambulatory systolic blood pressure change at 6 months. BL, baseline; CH, combined (systolic–diastolic) hypertension; GSR, Global SYMPLICITY Registry; HTN-3, SYMPLICITY HTN-3 trial; ISH, isolated systolic hypertension; RDN, catheter-based renal denervation.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Pooled dataset: change in systolic blood pressure for age ≥65 vs. <65 years at 6 months for patients with combined systolic–diastolic hypertension or isolated systolic hypertension. BL, baseline.

Comment in

References

    1. Daugherty SL, Powers JD, Magid DJ, Tavel HM, Masoudi FA, Margolis KL, O'Connor PJ, Selby JV, Ho PM. Incidence and prognosis of resistant hypertension in hypertensive patients. Circulation 2012;125:1635–1642. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Esler MD, Böhm M, Sievert H, Rump CL, Schmieder RE, Krum H, Mahfoud F, Schlaich MP. Catheter-based renal denervation for treatment of patients with treatment-resistant hypertension: 36 month results from the SYMPLICITY HTN-2 randomized clinical trial. Eur Heart J 2014;35:1752–1759. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Böhm M, Linz D, Ukena C, Esler M, Mahfoud F. Renal denervation for the treatment of cardiovascular high risk-hypertension or beyond? Circ Res 2014;115:400–409. - PubMed
    1. Mahfoud F, Lüscher TF, Andersson B, Baumgartner I, Cifkova R, Dimario C, Doevendans P, Fagard R, Fajadet J, Komajda M, Lefevre T, Lotan C, Sievert H, Volpe M, Widimsky P, Wijns W, Williams B, Windecker S, Witkowski A, Zeller T, Böhm M. Expert consensus document from the European Society of Cardiology on catheter-based renal denervation. Eur Heart J 2013;34:2149–2157. - PubMed
    1. Esler MD, Krum H, Schlaich M, Schmieder RE, Böhm M, Sobotka PA. Renal sympathetic denervation for treatment of drug-resistant hypertension: one-year results from the symplicity HTN-2 Randomized, Controlled Trial. Circulation 2012;126:2976–2982. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data