Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Jan 1;9(1):161-177.
doi: 10.1093/gbe/evw264.

Evolution and Diversity of Transposable Elements in Vertebrate Genomes

Affiliations
Review

Evolution and Diversity of Transposable Elements in Vertebrate Genomes

Cibele G Sotero-Caio et al. Genome Biol Evol. .

Abstract

Transposable elements (TEs) are selfish genetic elements that mobilize in genomes via transposition or retrotransposition and often make up large fractions of vertebrate genomes. Here, we review the current understanding of vertebrate TE diversity and evolution in the context of recent advances in genome sequencing and assembly techniques. TEs make up 4-60% of assembled vertebrate genomes, and deeply branching lineages such as ray-finned fishes and amphibians generally exhibit a higher TE diversity than the more recent radiations of birds and mammals. Furthermore, the list of taxa with exceptional TE landscapes is growing. We emphasize that the current bottleneck in genome analyses lies in the proper annotation of TEs and provide examples where superficial analyses led to misleading conclusions about genome evolution. Finally, recent advances in long-read sequencing will soon permit access to TE-rich genomic regions that previously resisted assembly including the gigantic, TE-rich genomes of salamanders and lungfishes.

Keywords: retrotransposons; transposable element; transposons; vertebrate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

<sc>Fig</sc>. 1.—
Fig. 1.—
Examples of the major TE types and a general classification scheme. Structural features are presented as follows: LTR retrotransposons – nucleocapsid protein (GAG), envelope protein (ENV), polyprotein (POL) that includes a protease (PRO), integrase (IN), reverse transcriptase (RT), and an RNase H (RH). Non-LTR retrotransposons – nuclear chaperone protein (ORF1), endonuclease domain (EN), RNA polymerase III promoter (A and B), poly-A or other repetitive tail (A(n) or ATTCTRTG(n)). Class II elements – transposase (TPASE), zinc finger domain (ZnF), replicase (REPL), helicase (HELI), polymerase B (PolB), ATPase (ATP), proteins of unknown function (?) and integrase (INT). Coding regions are depicted as boxes. Non-coding regions are depicted as lines. In some instances, the ENV gene in endogenous retroviruses may be missing (dotted line). Triangles represent repeated DNA sequences and the orientation of the triangle reflects the orientation of terminal repeats, if present.
<sc>Fig</sc>. 2.—
Fig. 2.—
(A) A general phylogeny of vertebrates. (B) Pie charts comparing the percentage of a genome derived from TEs. The area of the pie chart is proportional to genome size except for the west African lungfish and Axolotl. The genomes of these species are exceptionally large. A scaled pie-chart representing the human genome is presented for to illustrate this aspect. Please note that in all cases, the TE content is based on estimates made using the methods by the individual research teams studying each genome. Thus, the methods employed varied and represent the authors’ best estimates obtained using those methods.

References

    1. Acosta MJ, Marchal JA, Fernández-Espartero CH, Bullejos M, Sánchez A. 2008. Retroelements (LINEs and SINEs) in vole genomes: differential distribution in the constitutive heterochromatin. Chromosome Res. 16:949–959. - PubMed
    1. Adelson DL, Raison JM, Edgar RC. 2009. Characterization and distribution of retrotransposons and simple sequence repeats in the bovine genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 106:12855–12860. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Akagi K, Li J, Stephens RM, Volfovsky N, Symer DE. 2008. Extensive variation between inbred mouse strains due to endogenous L1 retrotransposition. Genome Res. 18:869–880. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alföldi J, et al. 2011. The genome of the green anole lizard and a comparative analysis with birds and mammals. Nature 477:587–591. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amemiya CT, et al. 2013. The African coelacanth genome provides insights into tetrapod evolution. Nature 496:311–316. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources