[Electrophysiological testing in spinal cord tumors]
- PMID: 28161015
- DOI: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2016.06.003
[Electrophysiological testing in spinal cord tumors]
Abstract
Evoked potentials (EPs) are useful to evaluate the functional impairment of motor and somatosensory pathways in spinal cord tumors. Conduction through pyramidal tracts is evaluated by motor EPs (MEPs) elicited by transcranial stimulation, magnetic for awake patients or electric in the operating room. Somatosensory EPs (SEPs) and laser EPs (LEPs) are complementary procedures to explore conduction in dorsal columns and spinothalamic tracts, respectively. MEPs as well as SEPs show conduction abnormalities in about 60% of cases with a sensitivity that increases up to 70% when both procedures are carried out. Abnormalities are observed in the absence of any clinical sign in respectively 7% and 15% of cases for MEPs and SEPs. Multilevel stimulations for SEPs recordings permit to detect segmental dysfunction in 70% in case of cervical TIM, even in the absence of clinical signs. LEPs are useful in specific clinical situations: they allow a dermatomal stimulation and are correlated to segmental thermoalgic anaesthesia. Electrophysiological testing plays an important role in the diagnostic and therapeutic strategy: before surgery, MEPs and SEPs objectively evaluate the functional impairment directly related to the lesion. They also help by permitting a follow-up, either before surgery when the surgical decision is delayed because of a good clinical tolerance of the lesion, or after operation to evaluate the functional evolution. Intraoperative monitoring of MEPs and SEPs allows informing the surgeon about the impact on each surgical manipulation. No prospective randomized study has been performed to date to compare clinical evolution after surgery with or without monitoring. Nevertheless, a wide consensus became established in favor of monitoring to limit the risk of postoperative definite deficit and to permit an optimal surgical resection without risk when responses are preserved.
Keywords: Intramedullary tumor; Laser evoked potentials; Monitoring; Motor evoked potentials; Potentiel évoqué laser; Potentiel évoqué moteur; Potentiel évoqué somesthésique; Somatosensory evoked potentials; Tumeur intramédullaire.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Intraoperative changes in transcranial motor evoked potentials and somatosensory evoked potentials predicting outcome in children with intramedullary spinal cord tumors.J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2014 Jun;13(6):591-9. doi: 10.3171/2014.2.PEDS1392. Epub 2014 Apr 4. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2014. PMID: 24702615 Free PMC article.
-
Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring of the spinal cord during spinal cord and spine surgery: a review focus on the corticospinal tracts.Clin Neurophysiol. 2008 Feb;119(2):248-64. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.09.135. Epub 2007 Nov 28. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008. PMID: 18053764 Review.
-
Monitoring of evoked potentials during spinal cord ischaemia: experimental evaluation in a rabbit model.Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1998 Oct;16(4):320-8. doi: 10.1016/s1078-5884(98)80051-8. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1998. PMID: 9818009
-
Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring for intradural extramedullary tumors: why not?Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015 Mar;130:140-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.01.007. Epub 2015 Jan 12. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015. PMID: 25618840
-
Intraoperative monitoring of motor evoked potentials: a review of 116 cases.Neurology. 1996 Oct;47(4):999-1004. doi: 10.1212/wnl.47.4.999. Neurology. 1996. PMID: 8857734 Review.
Cited by
-
Correlation of Intraoperative Neurophysiological Parameters and Outcomes in Patients with Intramedullary Tumors.Asian J Neurosurg. 2021 May 28;16(2):243-248. doi: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_234_20. eCollection 2021 Apr-Jun. Asian J Neurosurg. 2021. PMID: 34268146 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical