The variability of vertebral body volume and pain associated with osteoporotic vertebral fractures: conservative treatment versus percutaneous transpedicular vertebroplasty
- PMID: 28161853
- DOI: 10.1007/s00264-017-3409-2
The variability of vertebral body volume and pain associated with osteoporotic vertebral fractures: conservative treatment versus percutaneous transpedicular vertebroplasty
Abstract
Introduction: Osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVF) can lead to late collapse which often causes kyphotic spinal deformity, persistent back pain, decreased lung capacity, increased fracture risk and increased mortality. The purpose of our study is to compare the efficacy and safety of vertebroplasty against conservative management of osteoporotic vertebral fractures without neurologic symptoms.
Material and methods: A total of 66 patients with recent OVF on MRI examination were included in the study. All patients were admitted from September 2009 to September 2012. The cohort was divided into two groups. The first study group consisted of 33 prospectively followed consecutive patients who suffered 40 vertebral osteoporotic fractures treated by percutaneous vertebroplasty (group 1), and the control group consisted of 33 patients who suffered 41 vertebral osteoporotic fractures treated conservatively because they refused vertebroplasty (group 2). The data collection has been conducted in a prospective registration manner. The inclusion criteria consisted of painful OVF matched with imagistic findings. We assessed the results of pain relief and minimal sagittal area of the vertebral body on the axial CT scan at presentation, after the intervention, at six and 12 months after initial presentation.
Results: Vertebroplasty with poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) was performed in 30 patients on 39 VBs, including four thoracic vertebras, 27 vertebras of the thoracolumbar jonction and eight lumbar vertebras. Group 2 included 30 patients with 39 OVFs (four thoracic vertebras, 23 vertebras of the thoracolumbar junction and 11 lumbar vertebras). There was no significant difference in VAS scores before treatment (p = 0.229). The mean VAS was 5.90 in Group 1 and 6.28 in Group 2 before the treatment. Mean VAS after vertebroplasty was 0.85 in Group 1. The mean VAS at six months was 0.92 in Group 1 and 3.00 in Group 2 (p < 0.05). The mean VAS at 12 months was 0.92 in Group 1 and 2.36 in Group 2. The mean improvement rate in VAS scores was 84.40% and 62.42%, respectively (p < 0.05). For Group 1, mean area of the VBs measured on sagital CT images was 8.288 at the initial presentation, 8.554 postoperatively, 8.541 at five months and 8.508 at 12 months, respectively, and 8.388 at the initial presentation, 7.976 at six months and 7.585 at 12 months for Group 2 (Fig. 4).
Discussions: Although conservative treatment is fundamental and achieves good symptom control, in patients who suffer osteoporotic compression fractures (OCF), the incidence of late collapse is high and the prognosis is poor. In order to relieve the pain and avoid VB collapse, vertebroplasty is the recommended treatment in OCFs. Considering the above findings, the dilemma is whether vertebroplasty can change the natural history (pain and deformity) of OCFs.
Conclusion: In our study on OVF, vertebroplasty delivered superior clinical and radiological outcomes over the first year from intervention when compared to conservative treatment of patients with osteoporotic compression fractures without neurological deficit. We believe that the possibility of evolution towards progressive kyphosis is sufficient to justify prophylactic and therapeutic intervention such as vertebroplasty, a minor gesture compared with extensive correction surgery and stabilization.
Keywords: CT scan; Kyphotic deformity; Osteoporotic vertebral fractures; Vertebral body volume; Vertebroplasty; Visual analogic scale.
Comment in
-
Comment on Andrei Diana et al.: The variability of vertebral body volume and pain associated with osteoporotic vertebral fractures: conservative treatment versus percutaneous transpedicular vertebroplasty.Int Orthop. 2017 Dec;41(12):2637-2638. doi: 10.1007/s00264-017-3636-6. Epub 2017 Sep 11. Int Orthop. 2017. PMID: 28894918 No abstract available.
-
Reply to comment on Andrei et al.: The variability of vertebral body volume and pain associated with osteoporotic vertebral fractures: conservative treatment versus percutaneous transpedicular vertebroplasty.Int Orthop. 2018 Apr;42(4):971-972. doi: 10.1007/s00264-017-3749-y. Epub 2018 Feb 7. Int Orthop. 2018. PMID: 29417174 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Transpedicular vertebroplasty after intravertebral cavity formation versus conservative treatment for osteoporotic burst fractures.Spine J. 2014 Jan;14(1):39-48. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.03.016. Epub 2013 Apr 23. Spine J. 2014. PMID: 23623633
-
[Effectiveness of long segment fixation combined with vertebroplasty for severe osteoporotic thoracolumbar compressive fractures].Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Nov;27(11):1331-7. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013. PMID: 24501892 Chinese.
-
Balloon kyphoplasty versus vertebroplasty for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a prospective, comparative, and randomized clinical study.Osteoporos Int. 2010 Feb;21(2):359-64. doi: 10.1007/s00198-009-0952-8. Epub 2009 Jun 10. Osteoporos Int. 2010. PMID: 19513578 Clinical Trial.
-
Percutaneous vertebroplasty versus conservative treatment for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: An updated meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials.Int J Surg. 2017 Nov;47:25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.09.021. Epub 2017 Sep 20. Int J Surg. 2017. PMID: 28939236 Review.
-
Comparing pain reduction following vertebroplasty and conservative treatment for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Pain Physician. 2013 Sep-Oct;16(5):455-64. Pain Physician. 2013. PMID: 24077192
Cited by
-
Influence of the distribution of bone cement along the fracture line on the curative effect of vertebral augmentation.J Int Med Res. 2019 Sep;47(9):4505-4513. doi: 10.1177/0300060519864183. Epub 2019 Jul 31. J Int Med Res. 2019. PMID: 31364432 Free PMC article.
-
Comment on Andrei Diana et al.: The variability of vertebral body volume and pain associated with osteoporotic vertebral fractures: conservative treatment versus percutaneous transpedicular vertebroplasty.Int Orthop. 2017 Dec;41(12):2637-2638. doi: 10.1007/s00264-017-3636-6. Epub 2017 Sep 11. Int Orthop. 2017. PMID: 28894918 No abstract available.
-
Impact of Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Treatment-Related Decision Making for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture: A Prospective Randomized Trial.Med Sci Monit. 2018 Jan 3;24:50-57. doi: 10.12659/msm.905729. Med Sci Monit. 2018. PMID: 29298277 Free PMC article.
-
Indications for the monosegmental stabilization of thoraco-lumbar spine fractures.Int Orthop. 2019 Jan;43(1):169-176. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4226-y. Epub 2018 Nov 14. Int Orthop. 2019. PMID: 30430192
-
Orthopaedic surgery patients who use recreational marijuana have less pre-operative pain.Int Orthop. 2019 Feb;43(2):283-292. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4101-x. Epub 2018 Aug 22. Int Orthop. 2019. PMID: 30135987
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical