Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Jun;20(8):1473-1480.
doi: 10.1017/S1368980017000052. Epub 2017 Feb 6.

Impact of two policy interventions on dietary diversity in Ecuador

Juan Ponce  1 , Jesus Ramos-Martin  1
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Impact of two policy interventions on dietary diversity in Ecuador

Juan Ponce et al. Public Health Nutr. 2017 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To differentiate the effects of food vouchers and training in health and nutrition on consumption and dietary diversity in Ecuador by using an experimental design.

Design: Interventions involved enrolling three groups of approximately 200 randomly selected households per group in three provinces in Ecuador. Power estimates and sample size were computed using the Optimal Design software, with a power of 80 %, at 5 % of significance and with a minimum detectable effect of 0·25 (sd). The first group was assigned to receive a monthly food voucher of $US 40. The second group was assigned to receive the same $US 40 voucher, plus training on health and nutrition issues. The third group served as the control. Weekly household values of food consumption were converted into energy intake per person per day. A simple proxy indicator was constructed for dietary diversity, based on the Food Consumption Score. Finally, an econometric model with three specifications was used for analysing the differential effect of the interventions.

Setting: Three provinces in Ecuador, two from the Sierra region (Carchi and Chimborazo) and one from the Coastal region (Santa Elena).

Subjects: Members of 773 households randomly selected (n 4343).

Results: No significant impact on consumption for any of the interventions was found. However, there was evidence that voucher systems had a positive impact on dietary diversity. No differentiated effects were found for the training intervention.

Conclusions: The most cost-effective intervention to improve dietary diversity in Ecuador is the use of vouchers to support family choice in food options.

Keywords: Ecuador; Experimental design; Food vouchers; Policy effectiveness; Training.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. van den Bold M, Quisumbing AR & Gillespie S (2013) Women’s Empowerment and Nutrition. An Evidence Review. IFPRI Discussion Paper no. 01294. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
    1. Fiszbein A & Schady N (2009) Conditional Cash Transfers. Reducing Present and Future Poverty. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
    1. Torres I (2016) Policy windows for school-based health education about nutrition in Ecuador. Health Promot Int (Epublication ahead of print version). - PubMed
    1. Freire WB, Silva-Jaramillo KM, Ramirez-Luzuriaga MJ et al.. (2014) The double burden of undernutrition and excess body weight in Ecuador. Am J Clin Nutr 100, issue 6, 1636S–1643S. - PubMed
    1. Popkin BM, Adair LS & Ng SW (2012) Global nutrition transition and the pandemic of obesity in developing countries. Nutr Rev 70, 3–21. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types