Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017;19(2):30.
doi: 10.1007/s11051-016-3711-8. Epub 2017 Jan 17.

Differential pattern of deposition of nanoparticles in the airways of exposed workers

Affiliations

Differential pattern of deposition of nanoparticles in the airways of exposed workers

Elizabeth Fireman et al. J Nanopart Res. 2017.

Abstract

Ultrafine particles (UFP) have been postulated to significantly contribute to the adverse health effects associated with exposure to particulate matter (PM). Due to their extremely small size (aerodynamic diameter <100 nm), UFP are able to deposit deep within the lung after inhalation and evade many mechanisms responsible for the clearance of larger particles. There is a lack of biologically relevant personal exposure metrics for exposure to occupational- and environmental-related micro- and nano-sized PM. The aim of the present study is to assess UFP in induced sputum (IS) and exhaled breath condensate (EBC) as possible biomarkers for assessing lung function impairment. Sputum induction and EBC testing were performed by conventional methods. UFP particles were assessed with the NanoSight LM20 (NanoSight Ltd, London, UK). The subjects included 35 exposed and 25 non-exposed workers. There were no group differences in pulmonary function test results and differential cell counts, but 63.6% of the exposed subjects had a higher percentage of neutrophils (OR3.28 p = 0.03) compared to the non-exposed subjects. The exposed subjects had higher percentages of UFP between 10 and 50 nm (69.45 ± 18.70 vs 60.11 ± 17.52 for the non-exposed group, p = 0.004). No differences were found in the IS samples. Years of exposure correlated positively to UFP content (r = 0.342 p = 0.01) and macrophage content (r = -0.327 p = 0.03). The percentage of small fraction of UFP in EBC, but not IS, is higher in exposed workers, and EBC may be a sensitive biomarker to assess exposure to nanoparticles.

Keywords: Aerosols; EBC; Environmental and health effects; Induced sputum; Nanoparticle exposure; Ultrafine particles.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
a Frequency of UFP in EBC. b Frequency of UFP in IS. UFP were evaluated by NanoSight LM20 in the sputum specimens. The frequency of EBC UFP (a) and IS UFP (b) for each size (nm). The x-axis represents the particle size (nm), and the y-axis represents the frequency for each size

References

    1. Bar-Shai A, Alcalay Y, Sagiv A, Rotem M, Feigelson SW, Alon R, Fireman E (2015) Fingerprint of lung fluid ultrafine particles, a novel marker of acute lung inflammation respiration. 90:74–84 - PubMed
    1. Benor S, Alcalay Y, Domany KA, Gut G, Soferman R, Kivity S, Fireman E. Ultrafine particle content in exhaled breath condensate in airways of asthmatic children. J Breath Res. 2015;9:026001. doi: 10.1088/1752-7155/9/2/026001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bredberg A, Josefson M, Almstrand AC, Lausmaa J, Sall P, Levinsson A, Larsson P, Olin AC. Comparison of exhaled endogenous particles from smokers and non-smokers using multivariate analysis. Respiration. 2013;86:135–142. doi: 10.1159/000350941. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Debia M, Beaudry C, Weichenthal S, Tardif R, Dufrresne A (2013) Characterization and control of occupational exposure to nanoparticles and ultrafine particles. André Studies and Research Projects/Report R-777, Montréal, IRSST
    1. Enright HA, Bratt JM, Bluhm AP, Kenyon NJ, Louie AY. Tracking retention and transport of ultrafine polystyrene in an asthmatic mouse model using positron emission tomography. Exp Lung Res. 2013;39:304–313. doi: 10.3109/01902148.2013.819048. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources