Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan 31:12:6.
doi: 10.1186/s13017-017-0119-4. eCollection 2017.

Performance of imaging studies in patients with suspected appendicitis after stratification with adult appendicitis score

Affiliations

Performance of imaging studies in patients with suspected appendicitis after stratification with adult appendicitis score

Henna E Sammalkorpi et al. World J Emerg Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Diagnostic scoring is used to stratify patients with suspected appendicitis into three groups: high, intermediate, and low probability of appendicitis. The stratification can be used for selective imaging to avoid the harms of radiation without compromising diagnostic accuracy. The aim was to study how stratification by Adult Appendicitis Score affects diagnostic performance of imaging studies.

Methods: Analysis of 822 patients who underwent diagnostic imaging for suspected appendicitis was made. Adult Appendicitis Score was used to stratify patients into groups of high, intermediate, and low probability of appendicitis. Diagnostic performance of computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound (US) was compared between these patient groups.

Results: After scoring, pre-test probability of appendicitis ranged from 9-16% in low probability group to 75-79% in high probability group in patients who underwent US or CT. Post-test probability of appendicitis after positive CT was 99, 91, and 75% in high probability, intermediate probability and low probability groups, respectively, p < 0.001. After positive US the respective probabilities were 95, 91 and 42%, p < 0.001.

Conclusion: Diagnostic imaging has limited value in patients with low probability of appendicitis according to Adult Appendicitis Score.

Keywords: Abdomen, acute; Adult; Appendicitis; Imaging, diagnostic; Multidetector computed tomography; Ultrasonography, diagnostic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Diagnostic work-up of suspected acute appendicitis with Adult Appendicitis Score (AAS). MRI was performed instead of CT in pregnant patients
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Pre-test and post-test probability of appendicitis after positive and negative imaging results. Accuracy of imaging was dependent on the pre-test probability of appendicitis. Negative CT was accurate in all patient groups

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Boonstra PA, van Veen RN, Stockmann HB. Less negative appendectomies due to imaging in patients with suspected appendicitis. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:2365–2370. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3963-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Parker L, Nazarian LN, Gingold EL, Palit CD, Hoey CL, Frangos AJ. Cost and radiation savings of partial substitution of ultrasound for CT in appendicitis evaluation: a national projection. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202:124–135. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.9642. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kim K, Kim YH, Kim SY, et al. Low-dose abdominal CT for evaluating suspected appendicitis. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1596–1605. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1110734. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Atema JJ, Gans SL, Van Randen A, et al. Comparison of imaging strategies with conditional versus immediate contrast-enhanced computed tomography in patients with clinical suspicion of acute appendicitis. Eur Radiol. 2015;25:2445–2452. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3648-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lahaye MJ, Lambergts DM, Mutsaers E, et al. Mandatory imaging cuts costs and reduces the rate of unnecessary surgeries in the diagnostic work-up of patients suspected of having appendicitis. Eur Radiol. 2015;25:1464.1470. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3531-0. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types