Noninvasive axial and peripheral assessment of bone mineral content: a comparison between osteoporotic women and normal subjects
- PMID: 2816513
- DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650040506
Noninvasive axial and peripheral assessment of bone mineral content: a comparison between osteoporotic women and normal subjects
Abstract
We compared different methods of bone densitometry in women with spinal osteoporosis and normal subjects to assess their discriminatory capability. The methods used included: quantitative computed tomography of the spine (QCT) specified as to trabecular (QCTtrab) and cortical bone (QCTcort), dual-photon absorptiometry of the spine (DPAspine), single-photon absorptiometry of the distal and proximal forearm (SPAdist and SPAprox), and quantitative roentgen microdensitometry of the phalanx (QMD). A total of 25 postmenopausal osteoporotic women and 24 healthy comparison subjects matched for age and years since menopause were studied. In the osteoporotic group an average decrement of the axial bone mineral density of -50% (p less than 0.001) and -20% (p less than 0.001) were observed for QCTtrab and QCTcort, respectively. For DPAspine, SPAdist, SPAprox, and QMD the difference between normal and osteoporotic subjects was -20% (p less than 0.001), -12% (p less than 0.05), -7% (NS), and -6% (NS), respectively. With the peripheral measurements (SPA and QMD), alone or in combination, no adequate discrimination between women with or without vertebral compression fractures could be obtained. Although QCTtrab showed the highest diagnostic sensitivity (81%), it appears not to be superior to DPAspine. Combinations of the various axial and peripheral measurements did not result in an essentially better sensitivity. In normal women as well as in osteoporotic individuals the trabecular and cortical QCT measurements showed two opposite trends, suggesting an increase in cortical and a decrease in trabecular density from L1 to L3.
Similar articles
-
Quantitative CT assessment of the lumbar spine and radius in patients with osteoporosis.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996 Jul;167(1):133-40. doi: 10.2214/ajr.167.1.8659357. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996. PMID: 8659357
-
The spine deformity index in osteoporosis is not related to bone mineral and ultrasound measurements.Br J Radiol. 1992 May;65(773):393-6. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-65-773-393. Br J Radiol. 1992. PMID: 1611418
-
Bone mineral content in early-postmenopausal and postmenopausal osteoporotic women: comparison of measurement methods.Radiology. 1986 Aug;160(2):469-78. doi: 10.1148/radiology.160.2.3726129. Radiology. 1986. PMID: 3726129
-
[Comparative bone density measurements in healthy women and women with osteoporosis].Radiologe. 1988 Apr;28(4):153-60. Radiologe. 1988. PMID: 3289080 Review. German.
-
Bone mass measurement: how, where, when and why?Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud. 1993;38 Suppl 2:70-6. Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud. 1993. PMID: 8252108 Review.
Cited by
-
Age-dependence of bone material quality shown by the measurement of frequency of resonance in the ulna.Calcif Tissue Int. 1994 Feb;54(2):96-100. doi: 10.1007/BF00296058. Calcif Tissue Int. 1994. PMID: 8012878
-
Which bone to measure?Osteoporos Int. 1990 Oct;1(1):3-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01880409. Osteoporos Int. 1990. PMID: 2133637 No abstract available.
-
When bone mass fails to predict bone failure.Calcif Tissue Int. 1993;53 Suppl 1:S7-13. doi: 10.1007/BF01673395. Calcif Tissue Int. 1993. PMID: 8275383 Review.
-
Determinants of disease and disability in the elderly: the Rotterdam Elderly Study.Eur J Epidemiol. 1991 Jul;7(4):403-22. doi: 10.1007/BF00145007. Eur J Epidemiol. 1991. PMID: 1833235
-
Quantitative CT assessment of bone mineral density in dogs with hyperadrenocorticism.J Vet Sci. 2015;16(4):531-42. doi: 10.4142/jvs.2015.16.4.531. J Vet Sci. 2015. PMID: 26040613 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous