Allied health research positions: a qualitative evaluation of their impact
- PMID: 28166817
- PMCID: PMC5292788
- DOI: 10.1186/s12961-016-0166-4
Allied health research positions: a qualitative evaluation of their impact
Abstract
Background: Research positions embedded within healthcare settings have been identified as an enabler to allied health professional (AHP) research capacity; however, there is currently limited research formally evaluating their impact. In 2008, a Health Practitioner industrial agreement funded a research capacity building initiative within Queensland Health, Australia, which included 15 new allied health research positions. The present project used a qualitative and realist approach to explore the impact of these research positions, as well as the mechanisms which facilitated or hindered their success within their respective organisations.
Methods: Forty-four AHP employees from six governmental health services in Queensland, Australia, participated in the study. Individual interviews were undertaken, with individuals in research positions (n = 8) and their reporting line managers (n = 8). Four stakeholder focus groups were also conducted with clinicians, team leaders and professional heads who had engaged with the research positions.
Results: Nine key outcomes of the research positions were identified across individual, team/service and organisational/community levels. These outcomes included clinician skill development, increased research activity, clinical and service changes, increased research outputs and collaborations, enhanced research and workplace culture, improved profile of allied health, development of research infrastructure, and professional development of individuals in the research positions. Different mechanisms that influenced these outcomes were identified. These mechanisms were grouped by those related to the (1) research position itself, (2) organisational factors and (3) implementation factors.
Conclusions: The present findings highlight the potential value of the research positions for individuals, teams and clinical services across different governmental healthcare services, and demonstrate the impact of the roles on building the internal and external profile of allied health. Results build upon the emerging evidence base for allied health research positions and have important implications for a number of stakeholders (i.e. individuals in the research positions, AHPs and their managers, university partners and state-wide executives). Key recommendations are provided for all stakeholders to enhance the ongoing impact of these roles and the potential advocacy for additional positions and resources to support them.
Keywords: Allied health; Capacity building; Research personnel.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Realist evaluation of allied health management in Queensland: what works, in which contexts and why.Aust Health Rev. 2019 Aug;43(4):466-473. doi: 10.1071/AH17265. Aust Health Rev. 2019. PMID: 30158050
-
Effects and mechanisms of an allied health research position in a Queensland regional and rural health service: a descriptive case study.Aust Health Rev. 2018 Dec;42(6):667-675. doi: 10.1071/AH17086. Aust Health Rev. 2018. PMID: 29081350
-
Comparison of research experience and support needs of rural versus regional allied health professionals.Aust J Rural Health. 2015 Oct;23(5):277-85. doi: 10.1111/ajr.12234. Epub 2015 Sep 18. Aust J Rural Health. 2015. PMID: 26381792
-
Research capacity building frameworks for allied health professionals - a systematic review.BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Sep 15;18(1):716. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3518-7. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018. PMID: 30219065 Free PMC article.
-
The value of allied health professional research engagement on healthcare performance: a systematic review.BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jul 18;23(1):766. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09555-9. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023. PMID: 37464444 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Impact of the Fogarty Training Program on Trainee and Institutional Research Capacity Building at a Government Medical College in India.Ann Glob Health. 2020 Jul 28;86(1):86. doi: 10.5334/aogh.2932. Ann Glob Health. 2020. PMID: 32775217 Free PMC article.
-
A qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis exploring the impacts of clinical academic activity by healthcare professionals outside medicine.BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Apr 29;21(1):400. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06354-y. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021. PMID: 33926441 Free PMC article.
-
Impacts of clinical academic activity: qualitative interviews with healthcare managers and research-active nurses, midwives, allied health professionals and pharmacists.BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 7;11(10):e050679. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050679. BMJ Open. 2021. PMID: 34620661 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring research capacity and culture of allied health professionals: a mixed methods evaluation.BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jan 17;22(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07480-x. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022. PMID: 35039018 Free PMC article.
-
Development of a framework and research impact capture tool for nursing, midwifery, allied health professions, healthcare science, pharmacy and psychology (NMAHPPs).BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 May 3;23(1):433. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09451-2. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023. PMID: 37138350 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Pickstone C, Nancarrow S, Cooke J, Vernon W, Mountain G, Boyce RA, et al. Building research capacity in the allied health professions. Evid Policy. 2008;4(1):53–68. doi: 10.1332/174426408783477864. - DOI
-
- Harding K, Lynch L, Porter J, Taylor NF. Organisational benefits of a strong research culture in a health service: a systematic review. Aust Health Rev. 2016. doi:10.1071/AH15180. Ahead of print. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources