Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2017 Feb 6;7(2):e014190.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014190.

Does achieving the best practice tariff improve outcomes in hip fracture patients? An observational cohort study

Affiliations
Observational Study

Does achieving the best practice tariff improve outcomes in hip fracture patients? An observational cohort study

B Oakley et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: To determine if the introduction of the best practice tariff (BPT) has improved survival of the elderly hip fracture population, or if achieving BPT results in improved survival for an individual.

Setting: A single university-affiliated teaching hospital.

Participants: 2541 patients aged over 60 admitted with a neck of femur fracture between 2008 and 2010 and from 2012 to 2014 were included, to create two cohorts of patients, before and after the introduction of BPT. The post-BPT cohort was divided into two groups, those who achieved the criteria and those who did not.

Primary and secondary outcome measures: Primary outcomes of interest were differences in mortality across cohorts. Secondary analysis was performed to identify associations between individual BPT criteria and mortality.

Results: The introduction of BPT did not significantly alter overall 30-mortality in the hip fracture population (8.3% pre-BPT vs 10.0% post-BPT; p=0.128). Neither was there a significant reduction in length of stay (15 days (IQR 9-21) pre-BPT vs 14 days (IQR 11-22); p=0.236). However, the introduction of BPT was associated with a reduction in the time from admission to theatre (median 44 hours pre-BPT (IQR 24-44) vs 23 hours post-BPT (IQR 17-30); p<0.005). 30-day mortality in those who achieved BPT was significantly lower (6.0% vs 21.0% in those who did not achieve-BPT; p<0.005). There was a survival benefit at 1 year for those who achieved BPT (28.6% vs 42.0% did not achieve-BPT; p<0.005). Multivariate logistic regression revealed that of the BPT criteria, AMT monitoring and expedited surgery were the only BPT criteria that significantly influenced survival.

Conclusions: The introduction of the BPT has not led to a demonstrable improvement in outcomes at organisational level, though other factors may have confounded any benefits. However, patients where BPT criteria are met appear to have improved outcomes.

Keywords: ORTHOPAEDIC & TRAUMA SURGERY.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Kaplan–Meier survival analysis comparing long-term survival before and after the introduction of BPT. BPT, best practice tariff.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan–Meier analysis of long-term survival comparing those who achieved BPT criteria against those who did not. BPT, best practice tariff.

References

    1. Holt G, Smith R, Duncan K et al. . Changes in population demographics and the future incidence of hip fracture. Injury 2009;40:722–6. 10.1016/j.injury.2008.11.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cooper C, Campion G, Melton LJ 3rd. Hip fractures in the elderly: a world-wide projection. Osteoporos Int 1992;2:285–9. 10.1007/BF01623184 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baker PN, Salar O, Ollivere BJ et al. . Evolution of the hip fracture population: time to consider the future? A retrospective observational analysis. BMJ Open 2014;4:e004405 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004405 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Royal College of Physicians. National Hip Fracture Database annual report 2016. London: RCP, 2016.
    1. Griffin XL, Parsons N, Achten J et al. . Recovery of health-related quality of life in a United Kingdom hip fracture population. The Warwick Hip Trauma Evaluation—a prospective cohort study. Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:372–82. 10.1302/0301-620X.97B3.35738 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types