Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Dec;37(4):143-151.

Current Methods of Haemolysis Detection and Reporting as a Source of Risk to Patient Safety: a Narrative Review

Affiliations
Review

Current Methods of Haemolysis Detection and Reporting as a Source of Risk to Patient Safety: a Narrative Review

Euan J McCaughey et al. Clin Biochem Rev. 2016 Dec.

Abstract

Aim: Haemolysis has a major impact on patient safety as the need for a replacement specimen increases the risk of injury and infection, delays test results and extends the duration of hospital stays. Consistency of haemolysis detection and reporting can facilitate the generation of benchmark data used to develop quality practices to monitor and reduce this leading cause of pre-analytical laboratory error. This review aims to investigate current methods of haemolysis detection and reporting.

Method: Due to known heterogeneity and immaturity of the research field, a scoping search was conducted using PUBMED, Embase, Medline and CINAHL. Articles published between 2000 and 2014 that reported haemolysis rates in specimens from the general population were included.

Results: Of the 50 studies that met the inclusion criteria, 20 detected haemolysis using the Haemolysis Index (HI), 19 by visual inspection and 13 by undefined methods. There was large intra-study variation in the plasma free haemoglobin level used to establish haemolysis (HI: mean±SD 846±795 mg/L, range 150-3000 mg/L; Visual: 850±436 mg/L, 500-3000 mg/L). Sixteen studies reported the analyte of interest, with only three studies reporting a haemoglobin level at which the specimen would be rejected.

Conclusion: Despite haemolysis being a frequent and costly problem with a negative impact on patient care, there is poor consistency in haemolysis detection and reporting between studies. Improved consistency would facilitate the generation of benchmark data used to create quality practices to monitor and reduce this leading cause of pre-analytical laboratory error.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure.
Figure.
PRISMA flow diagram of search protocol.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Franco RS. The measurement and importance of red cell survival. Am J Hematol. 2009;84:109–14. - PubMed
    1. Carraro P, Plebani M. Errors in a stat laboratory: types and frequencies 10 years later. Clin Chem. 2007;53:1338–42. - PubMed
    1. Lippi G, Blanckaert N, Bonini P, Green S, Kitchen S, Palicka V, et al. Haemolysis: an overview of the leading cause of unsuitable specimens in clinical laboratories. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2008;46:764–72. - PubMed
    1. Šimundić A-M, Topic E, Nikolac N, Lippi G. Hemolysis detection and management of hemolyzed specimens. Biochem Med. 2010;20:154–9.
    1. Lippi G, Plebani M, Di Somma S, Cervellin G. Hemolyzed specimens: a major challenge for emergency departments and clinical laboratories. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2011;48:143–53. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources