Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017:2017:2026979.
doi: 10.1155/2017/2026979. Epub 2017 Jan 11.

Quality of Breast Cancer Information on the Internet by African Organizations: An Appraisal

Affiliations
Review

Quality of Breast Cancer Information on the Internet by African Organizations: An Appraisal

Cynthia Pomaa Akuoko. Int J Breast Cancer. 2017.

Abstract

Objective. The aim of this study was to appraise the quality of information on BC available at websites run by organizations in Africa. Methods. Three searches were conducted using Google search engine to generate a list of websites. The identified websites were assessed using European Commission (EC) quality criteria for health-related websites, which comprises different assessment areas including, completeness, transparency and honesty, authority, privacy and data protection, updating of information, accountability, and accessibility. Results. Thirteen (13) websites were included in the evaluation. Majority of the websites evaluated had low scores on the completeness and transparency of their websites. Scores on accessibility were however moderate and high for most of the websites. Breast cancer-specific organizations provided the highest quality information, particularly in terms of completeness. The overall lowest and highest quality scores were 9 and 43 out of 63, respectively, and 77% of the included websites scored less than 50% of the total quality score. Conclusion. This review has provided evidence of inadequate and inaccurate BC information provided by some cancer organizations in Africa. Considerable effort is required to make BC information on the Internet a valuable and up-to-date source for both professionals and patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Performance of the websites (completeness, transparency, and accessibility).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Brashers D. E., Goldsmith D. J., Hsteh E. Information seeking and avoiding in health contexts. Human Communication Research. 2002;28(2):258–271. doi: 10.1093/hcr/28.2.258. - DOI
    1. Gopal R. L. R., Beaver K., Barnett T., Ismail N. S. N. A comparison of the information needs of women newly diagnosed with breast cancer in Malaysia and the United Kingdom. Cancer Nursing. 2005;28(2):132–140. - PubMed
    1. Luker K. A., Beaver K., Leinster S. J., Owens R. G. Information needs and sources of information for women with breast cancer: a follow-up study. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1996;23(3):487–495. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1996.tb00010.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fogel J., Albert S. M., Schnabel F., Ditkoff B. A., Neugut A. I. Internet use and social support in women with breast cancer. Health Psychology. 2002;21(4):398–404. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.21.4.398. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Craigie M., Loader B., Burrows R., Muncer S. Reliability of health information on the Internet: an examination of experts' ratings. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2002;4(1):17–27. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4.3.e17. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources