Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Jan 23:5:5.
doi: 10.3389/fped.2017.00005. eCollection 2017.

The Impact of Central Venous Catheters on Pediatric Venous Thromboembolism

Affiliations
Review

The Impact of Central Venous Catheters on Pediatric Venous Thromboembolism

Julie Jaffray et al. Front Pediatr. .

Abstract

The use of central venous catheters (CVCs) in children is escalating, which is likely linked to the increased incidence of pediatric venous thromboembolism (VTE). In order to better understand the specific risk factors associated with CVC-VTE in children, as well as available prevention methods, a literature review was performed. The overall incidence of CVC-VTE was found to range from 0 to 74%, depending on the patient population, CVC type, imaging modality, and study design. Throughout the available literature, there was not a consistent determination regarding whether a particular type of central line (tunneled vs. non-tunneled vs. peripherally inserted vs. implanted), catheter material, insertion technique, or insertion location lead to an increased VTE risk. The patient populations who were found to be most at risk for CVC-VTE were those with cancer, congenital heart disease, gastrointestinal failure, systemic infection, intensive care unit admission, or involved in a trauma. Both mechanical and pharmacological prophylactic techniques have been shown to be successful in preventing VTE in adult patients, but studies in children have yet to be performed or are underpowered. In order to better determine true CVC-VTE risk factors and best preventative techniques, an increase in large, prospective pediatric trials needs to be performed.

Keywords: central venous catheter; pediatric; peripherally inserted central catheter; thromboprophylaxis; tunneled line; venous thromboembolism; venous thrombosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Raffini L, Huang YS, Witmer C, Feudtner C. Dramatic increase in venous thromboembolism in children’s hospitals in the United States from 2001 to 2007. Pediatrics (2009) 124:1001–8.10.1542/peds.2009-0768 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Raffini L, Trimarchi T, Beliveau J, Davis D. Thromboprophylaxis in a pediatric hospital: a patient-safety and quality-improvement initiative. Pediatrics (2011) 127:e1326–32.10.1542/peds.2010-3282 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Higgerson RA, Lawson KA, Christie LM, Brown AM, McArthur JA, Totapally BR, et al. Incidence and risk factors associated with venous thrombotic events in pediatric intensive care unit patients. Pediatr Crit Care Med (2011) 12:628–34.10.1097/PCC.0b013e318207124a - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andrew M, Monagle P, Brooker L. Thromboembolic Complications during Infancy and Childhood. Hamilton, Canada: Decker; (2000).
    1. Andrew M, Monagle P, Brooker L. Epidemiology of venous thromboembolic events. In: Andrew M, editor. Thromboembolic Complications during Infancy and Childhood. Hamilton, Canada: Decker; (2000). p. 111–46.

LinkOut - more resources