Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2017 Jun;21(2):147-157.
doi: 10.1007/s10006-017-0609-2. Epub 2017 Feb 7.

Immediate post-extraction implants with or without pure platelet-rich plasma: a 5-year follow-up study

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Immediate post-extraction implants with or without pure platelet-rich plasma: a 5-year follow-up study

Silvio Taschieri et al. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was comparison of clinical and radiographic outcomes of immediate post-extraction implants with or without the use of pure platelet-rich plasma (P-PRP) in the short- and medium-term follow-up.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed to assess soft tissue healing, implant and prosthesis survival, marginal bone level changes and biological complications.

Results: A total of 109 partially edentulous patients with 126 implants were included in this analysis. At 4-5 years after loading, cumulative survival rate in test group was 97.4% and in control group was 97.8%, with no significant differences. After 5 years of function, marginal bone loss (MBL) in test group was 0.8 ± 0.35 and 1.02 ± 0.27 mm for immediate and delayed loading, respectively, and in control group was 0.6 ± 0.16 and 0.8 ± 0.89 mm for immediate and delayed loading, respectively. No significant differences in MBL were observed intragroups and intergroups at any time point considered. Soft tissue healing score was significantly higher in test group compared to the control at 3 and 7 days after surgery, with significant differences.

Conclusions: P-PRP implant group showed a better soft tissue management and wound healing in the first 7 days after surgery compared to non-P-PRP implant group. In the medium-term follow-up, comparable clinical and radiographic outcomes were noticed between two groups.

Keywords: Autologous platelet concentrate; Fresh extraction socket; Immediate implantation; Platelet-rich plasma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2014 Jan;11(1):59-66 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 Aug;91(8):987-96 - PubMed
    1. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29 Suppl:186-215 - PubMed
    1. J Int Acad Periodontol. 2013 Oct;15(4):113-24 - PubMed
    1. Implant Dent. 2015 Oct;24(5):592-7 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources