Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr;264(4):701-708.
doi: 10.1007/s00415-017-8399-x. Epub 2017 Feb 6.

Functional impairment in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1 can be assessed by an ataxia rating scale (SARA)

Affiliations

Functional impairment in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1 can be assessed by an ataxia rating scale (SARA)

Giovanni DiPaolo et al. J Neurol. 2017 Apr.

Abstract

Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is not characterised by ataxia per se; however, DM1 and ataxia patients show similar disturbances in movement coordination often experiencing walking and balance difficulties, although caused by different underlying pathologies. This study aims to investigate the use of a scale previously described for the assessment and rating of ataxia (SARA) with the hypothesis that it could have utility in DM1 patients as a measure of disease severity and risk of falling. Data from 54 DM1 patients were pulled from the PHENO-DM1 natural history study for analysis. Mean SARA score in the DM1 population was 5.45 relative to the maximum score of eight. A flooring effect (score 0) was observed in mild cases within the sample. Inter-rater and test-retest reliability was high with intraclass coefficients (ICC) of 0.983 and 1.00, respectively. Internal consistency was acceptable as indicated by a Cronbach's alpha of 0.761. Component analysis revealed two principle components. SARA correlated with: (1) all measures of muscle function tested, including quantitative muscle testing of ankle dorsiflexion (r = -0.584*), the 6 min walk test (r = -0.739*), 10 m walk test (r = 0.741*), and the nine hole peg test (r = 0.602*) and (2) measures of disease severity/burden, such as MIRS (r = 0.718*), MDHI (r = 0.483*), and DM1-Activ (r = -0.749*) (*p < 0.001). The SARA score was predicted by an interaction between modal CTG repeat length and age at sampling (r = 0.678, p = 0.003). A score of eight or above predicted the use of a walking aid with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 85.7%. We suggest that further research is warranted to ascertain whether SARA or components of SARA are useful outcome measures for clinical trials in DM1. As a tool, it can be used for gathering information about disease severity/burden and helping to identify patients in need of a walking aid, and can potentially be applied in both research and healthcare settings.

Keywords: Balance; DM1; Falls; Myotonic dystrophy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest

Giovanni Di Paolo: This project was part of Mr. Di Paolo MRes’ research project. Cecilia Jimenez Moreno: Mrs Jimenez Moreno PhD studentship is a combined funding from Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACYT), Mexico (ID 611819) and a university scholarship from the MRC centre for neuromuscular diseases and the Barbour Foundation, UK. Nikoletta Nikolenko: Dr. Nikolenko’s contract is part of the PHENO-DM1 study grant. Antonio Atalaia: No conflict of interests. Darren G. Monckton: Prof. Monckton has been supported by awards from the Muscular Dystrophy UK, the Myotonic Dystrophy Support Group, and the European Union. Professor Monckton has also been a paid scientific consultant of Biogen Idec and AMO Pharma. Michela Guglieri: No conflict of interests. Hanns Lochmüller: Prof. Lochmüller has been awarded with the National Institute of Health Research IHR and Wyck grant to perform the PHENO-DM1 study.

Ethical standards

The author declares that the research documented in the submitted manuscript has been carried out in accordance with high research and ethical standards.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
SARA score according to gait status in daily life activities. Values are mean (SD)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chen H. Atlas of genetic diagnosis and counselling. Totowa: Humana Press; 2006. p. 1077.
    1. Turner C, Hilton-Jones D. Myotonic dystrophy: diagnosis, management and new therapies. Curr Opin Neurol. 2014;27:599–606. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000128. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thornton CA. Myotonic dystrophy. Neurol Clin. 2014;32:705–719. doi: 10.1016/j.ncl.2014.04.011. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bird TD (2015) Myotonic dystrophy type 1. In: Pagon RA, Adam MP, Ardinger HH, et al (eds) GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA), University of Washington, Seattle, 1993–2017. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1165/ - PubMed
    1. Groh WJ, Groh MR, Shen C, Monckton DG, Bodkin CL, Pascuzzi RM. Survival and CTG repeat expansion in adults with myotonic dystrophy type 1. Muscle Nerve. 2011;43(5):648–651. doi: 10.1002/mus.21934. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances