Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2018 Feb;38(1):313-321.
doi: 10.1007/s10792-017-0469-7. Epub 2017 Feb 6.

Extended targeted retinal photocoagulation versus conventional pan-retinal photocoagulation for proliferative diabetic retinopathy in a randomized clinical trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Extended targeted retinal photocoagulation versus conventional pan-retinal photocoagulation for proliferative diabetic retinopathy in a randomized clinical trial

Homayoun Nikkhah et al. Int Ophthalmol. 2018 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the clinical efficacy of extended targeted retinal photocoagulation (ETRP) compared to conventional panretinal photocoagulation (CPRP) in proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR).

Methods: In a single-masked randomized clinical trial, 270 eyes of 234 patients with naïve early or high-risk PDR were randomly assigned to receive either CPRP or ETRP (135 eyes, each treatment arm). Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measurement, fundus examination, wide-field fluorescein angiography (WFFA) and optical coherence tomography were carried out before and 3 months after retinal photocoagulation. Primary outcome was early PDR regression, specified as reduction in retinal neovascularization based on WFFA at 3 months. Secondary outcomes were BCVA and central macular thickness (CMT) changes.

Results: There were significantly more high-risk PDR eyes in ETRP group compared to CPRP (109 and 94 eyes, respectively, P = 0.04). Early PDR regression occurred in 71.9 and 64.4% of eyes in the ETRP and CPRP groups, respectively (P = 0.19). The mean number of applied laser spots in the ETRP was significantly fewer than CPRP (1202 vs. 1360, respectively, P < 0.001). Mean BCVA at baseline and 3 months post-laser were 0.37 ± 0.26 and 0.47 ± 0.19 logMAR in the ETRP arm, respectively. In the CPRP arm these values were 0.40 ± 0.27 and 0.47 ± 0.24 logMAR, respectively. Although mean BCVA decreased significantly in both treatment arms (ETRP P < 0.001, CPRP P = 0.009), the difference was not significant between arms (P = 0.68). CMT increased significantly in both groups (ETRP 41.08 μm, P < 0.001, CPRP 33.31 μm, P < 0.001). Nevertheless, the difference between the groups was not significant (P = 0.26).

Conclusions: ETRP with fewer number of laser spots may be an appropriate alternative to CPRP in PDR regression at least through 3 months.

Gov registration number: NCT01232179.

Keywords: Extended targeted retinal photocoagulation; Panretinal photocoagulation; Proliferative diabetic retinopathy.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Acta Ophthalmol. 2013 May;91(3):251-8 - PubMed
    1. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012 May;96(5):614-8 - PubMed
    1. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1968 Mar-Apr;72(2):246-52 - PubMed
    1. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1985 Apr;14(2):252-60 - PubMed
    1. Ophthalmology. 1985 Nov;92(11):1532-7 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources