Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1989 Nov;45(5):803-13.

Testing separate families of segregation hypotheses: bootstrap methods

Affiliations

Testing separate families of segregation hypotheses: bootstrap methods

N Schork et al. Am J Hum Genet. 1989 Nov.

Abstract

Aspects of the statistical modeling and assessment of hypotheses concerning quantitative traits in genetics research are discussed. It is suggested that a traditional approach to such modeling and hypothesis testing, whereby competing models are "nested" in an effort to simplify their probabilistic assessment, can be complimented by an alternative statistical paradigm - the separate-families-of-hypotheses approach to segregation analysis. Two bootstrap-based methods are described that allow testing of any two, possibly non-nested, parametric genetic hypotheses. These procedures utilize a strategy in which the unknown distribution of a likelihood ratio-based test statistic is simulated, thereby allowing the estimation of critical values for the test statistic. Though the focus of this paper concerns quantitative traits, the strategies described can be applied to qualitative traits as well. The conceptual advantages and computational ease of these strategies are discussed, and their significance levels and power are examined through Monte Carlo experimentation. It is concluded that the separate-families-of-hypotheses approach, when carried out with the methods described in this paper, not only possesses some favorable statistical properties but also is well suited for genetic segregation analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ann Hum Genet. 1976 May;39(4):485-91 - PubMed
    1. Am J Hum Genet. 1979 Nov;31(6):655-61 - PubMed
    1. Ann Hum Genet. 1982 Oct;46(Pt 4):373-83 - PubMed
    1. Am J Hum Genet. 1983 Sep;35(5):816-26 - PubMed
    1. Am J Hum Genet. 1983 Nov;35(6):1179-89 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources