Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Controlled Clinical Trial
. 2017 Feb 7;17(1):27.
doi: 10.1186/s12883-017-0809-2.

Evaluation and implementation of highly challenging balance training in clinical practice for people with Parkinson's disease: protocol for the HiBalance effectiveness-implementation trial

Breiffni Leavy  1   2 , Lydia Kwak  3 , Maria Hagströmer  4   5 , Erika Franzén  4   6   7
Affiliations
Controlled Clinical Trial

Evaluation and implementation of highly challenging balance training in clinical practice for people with Parkinson's disease: protocol for the HiBalance effectiveness-implementation trial

Breiffni Leavy et al. BMC Neurol. .

Abstract

Background: If people with progressive neurological diseases are to avail of evidence-based rehabilitation, programs found effective in randomized controlled trials (RCT's) must firstly be adapted and tested in clinical effectiveness studies as a means of strengthening their evidence base. This paper describes the protocol for an effectiveness-implementation trial that will assess the clinical effectiveness of a highly challenging balance training program (the HiBalance program) for people with mild-moderate Parkinson's disease (PD) while simultaneously collecting data concerning the way in which the program is implemented. The HiBalance program is systemically designed to target balance impairments in PD and has been shown effective at improving balance control and gait in a previous RCT. Study aims are to i) determine the effectiveness of the adapted HiBalance program on performance and self-rated outcomes such as balance control, gait and physical activity level ii) conduct a process evaluation of program implementation at the various clinics iii) determine barriers and facilitators to program implementation in these settings.

Methods: This effectiveness-implementation type 1 hybrid study will use a non-randomized controlled design with consecutive inclusion of people with PD at multiple clinical sites. A mixed method approach will be used to collect clinical effectiveness data and process evaluation data which is both quantitative and qualitative in nature. The consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR) will be used to guide the planning and collection of data concerning implementation barriers and facilitators. The HiBalance program will be provided by physical therapists as a part of standard rehabilitation care at the clinical sites, while the evaluation of the implementation process will be performed by the research group and funded by research grants.

Discussion: An effectiveness-implementation study design benefits patients by speeding up the process of translating findings from research settings to routine health care. Findings from this study will also be highly relevant for those working with neurological rehabilitation when faced with decisions concerning the translation of training programs from efficacy studies to everyday clinical practice.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov march 2016, NCT02727478 .

Keywords: Balance training; Effectiveness-implementation; Parkinson’s disease; Pragmatic study design.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Overview of study phases for the HiBalance effectiveness-implementation trial
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Rahman S, et al. Quality of life in Parkinson’s disease: the relative importance of the symptoms. Mov Disord. 2008;23(10):1428–34. doi: 10.1002/mds.21667. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kerr GK, et al. Predictors of future falls in Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2010;75(2):116–24. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181e7b688. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Paul SS, et al. The relative contribution of physical and cognitive fall risk factors in people with Parkinson’s disease: a large prospective cohort study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014;28(3):282–90. doi: 10.1177/1545968313508470. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Parashos SA, et al. Falls in Parkinson disease: analysis of a large cross-sectional cohort. J Parkinsons Dis. 2013;3(4):515–22. - PubMed
    1. Pickering RM, et al. A meta-analysis of six prospective studies of falling in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2007;22(13):1892–900. doi: 10.1002/mds.21598. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data