Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Feb 8;6(1):23.
doi: 10.1186/s40249-017-0242-1.

Characterisation of larval habitats, species composition and factors associated with the seasonal abundance of mosquito fauna in Gezira, Sudan

Mostafa M Mahgoub  1 , Eliningaya J Kweka  2   3 , Yousif E Himeidan  4
Affiliations

Characterisation of larval habitats, species composition and factors associated with the seasonal abundance of mosquito fauna in Gezira, Sudan

Mostafa M Mahgoub et al. Infect Dis Poverty. .

Abstract

Background: Larval source management (LSM), which requires an understanding of the ecology and composition of the local mosquito fauna, is an important parameter in successful vector control programmes. The present study was conducted to understand the distribution of larval habitats, species composition and factors associated with the seasonal abundance of mosquito larvae in Gezira irrigation Scheme in Gezira state, central Sudan.

Methods: Cross-sectional larval surveys were carried out in the communities of Barakat (urban) and El-Kareiba (semi-urban), in Wad Madani, Gezira. A standard dipper was used for sampling larvae in all possible breeding sites and enamel bowls were employed for larvae sorting. Habitats were characterised using physical features and all larvae specimens were identified morphologically.

Results: A total of 331 larval habitats were surveyed, out of which 166 were found to be positive breeding sites for Anopheles (56.78%), Culicinae (29.67%) and Aedes (13.55%) species. A total of 5 525 larvae collected were categorised as Culex (2 617, 47.37%), Anopheles (2 600, 47.06%) and Aedes (308, 5.57%). There was a high number of positive habitats during the rainy season, while the lowest proportion was reported during the hot dry season, in both study sites (Barakat [χ 2 = 10.641, P = 0.0090], El-Kareiba [χ 2 = 23.765, P = 0.0001]). The main breeding site for Anopheles larvae was leaking water pipes (51.5%), followed by irrigation channels (34.2%), hoof prints (6.4%), tyre tracks (5.5%) and water tanks (2.4%). A logistic regression analysis showed that the abundance of Anopheles larvae was reduced by the presence of predators (backswimmers, tadpoles) and grass cover. Adult productivity (number of adult females emerged/m2) was not homogeneousfor all habitats; the highest productivity was found in irrigation channels (0.78 females/m2) for Anopheles, and in septic tanks (2.86 females/m2) for Culicinae and (0.86 females/m2) for Aedes. Anopheles arabiensis was found to be the dominant Anopheles species. This study documented the presence of An. funestus in central Sudan for the first time.

Conclusions: Maintaining leaking water pipes and adopting intermittent irrigation are recommended for LSM, as these surveyed habitats represent the main source of maintaining the local mosquito population during the hot dry season.

Keywords: Aedes; Anopheles; Culex; Gezira; Habitats; Larvae; Mosquitoes; Seasonal abundance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A map showing the study sites
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Distribution of breeding sites during the three seasons. KC: El-Kareiba cold season, KD: El-Kareiba dry season; KR: El-Kareiba rainy season; BC: Barakat cold season; BD: Barakat dry season; BR: Barakat rainy season
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Mean larval densities of Anopheles, Culex and Aedes mosquitoes by habitat type
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Densities of Anopheles (a), Culex (b) and Aedes (c) mosquitoes in the different types of land in Barakat and El-Kareiba
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ogden N, Milka R, Caminade C, Gachon P. Recent and projected future climatic suitability of North America for the Asian tiger mosquito Aedes albopictus. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:532. doi: 10.1186/s13071-014-0532-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Medeiros-Sousa AR, Ceretti-Júnior W, de Carvalho GC, Nardi MS, Araujo AB, Vendrami DP, et al. Diversity and abundance of mosquitoes (Diptera:Culicidae) in an urban park: Larval habitats and temporal variation. Acta Trop. 2015;150:200–9. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2015.08.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Campbell LP, Luther C, Moo-Llanes D, Ramsey JM, Danis-Lozano R, Peterson AT. Climate change influences on global distributions of dengue and chikungunya virus vectors. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015;370:20140135. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Leaf A. Potential health effects of global climatic and environmental changes. N Engl J Med. 1989;321:1577–83. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198912073212305. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Medlock JM, Leach SA. Effect of climate change on vector-borne disease risk in the UK. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015;15:721–30. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)70091-5. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources