Fourth-grade children's dietary reporting accuracy by meal component: Results from a validation study that manipulated retention interval and prompts
- PMID: 28174038
- PMCID: PMC5391147
- DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.02.005
Fourth-grade children's dietary reporting accuracy by meal component: Results from a validation study that manipulated retention interval and prompts
Abstract
We examined reporting accuracy by meal component (beverage, bread, breakfast meat, combination entrée, condiment, dessert, entrée, fruit, vegetable) with validation-study data on 455 fourth-grade children (mean age = 9.92 ± 0.41 years) observed eating school meals and randomized to one of eight dietary recall conditions (two retention intervals [short, long] crossed with four prompts [forward, meal-name, open, reverse]). Accuracy category (match [observed and reported], omission [observed but unreported], intrusion [unobserved but reported]) was a polytomous nominal item response variable. We fit a multilevel cumulative logit model with item variables meal component and serving period (breakfast, lunch) and child variables retention interval, prompt and sex. Significant accuracy category predictors were meal component (p < 0.0003), retention interval (p < 0.0003), meal-component × serving-period (p < 0.0003) and meal-component × retention-interval (p = 0.001). The relationship of meal component and accuracy category was much stronger for lunch than breakfast. For lunch, beverages were matches more often, omissions much less often and intrusions more often than expected under independence; fruits and desserts were omissions more often. For the meal-component × retention-interval interaction, for the short retention interval, beverages were intrusions much more often but combination entrées and condiments were intrusions less often; for the long retention interval, beverages were matches more often and omissions less often but fruits were matches less often. Accuracy for each meal component appeared better with the short than long retention interval. For lunch and for the short retention interval, children's reporting was most accurate for entrée and combination entrée meal components, whereas it was least accurate for vegetable and fruit meal components. Results have implications for conclusions of studies and interventions assessed with dietary recalls obtained from children.
Keywords: Children; Dietary recall; Meal component; Reporting accuracy; School meals.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Baranowski T, Baranowski J, Cullen KW, Marsh T, Islam N, Zakeri I, et al. Squire’s Quest! Dietary outcome evaluation of a multimedia game. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2003;24(1):52–61. - PubMed
-
- Baranowski T, Dworkin R, Henske JC, Clearman DR, Dunn JK, Nader PR, et al. The accuracy of children’s self-reports of diet: Family Health Project. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 1986;86(10):1381–1385. - PubMed
-
- Bartlett S, Olsho L, Klerman J, Patlan KL, Blocklin M, Connor P. Evaluation of the Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program (FFVP): Final evaluation report. Alexandria, VA: US Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service; Project Officers: Karen Castellanos-Brown and Allison Magness; 2013. Prepared by Abt Associates under Contract No. AG-3198-D-09-0053.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
