Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Feb 7;3(1):e7.
doi: 10.2196/publichealth.6949.

SmartMom Text Messaging for Prenatal Education: A Qualitative Focus Group Study to Explore Canadian Women's Perceptions

Sarah Munro  1   2 , Amber Hui  3 , Vanessa Salmons  4 , Carolyn Solomon  5 , Emily Gemmell  3 , Nahal Torabi  6 , Patricia A Janssen  3
Affiliations

SmartMom Text Messaging for Prenatal Education: A Qualitative Focus Group Study to Explore Canadian Women's Perceptions

Sarah Munro et al. JMIR Public Health Surveill. .

Abstract

Background: We engaged Canadian women in the development of a prenatal education program delivered via one-way text messaging called SmartMom. SmartMom is the first peer-reviewed, evidence-based mHealth program for prenatal education in Canada and the first to be endorsed by the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada.

Objective: To explore women's preferences for a prenatal education program by text messaging.

Methods: We conducted a qualitative focus group study in three Canadian communities in the Northern Health Authority. Women completed a demographic questionnaire, participated in a guided discussion about their pregnancy information-seeking behavior, reviewed a printed copy of the SmartMom text messages, and then engaged in a moderated discussion about their perceptions of the usability of the SmartMom program. Open-ended questions explored women's perceptions regarding the message content, acceptability of receiving information by text message, positive health behaviors they might engage in after receiving a message, modifiable program factors, and intention to use the program. Thematic analysis of transcribed audio recordings was undertaken and modifications were made to the SmartMom program based on these findings.

Results: A total of 40 women participated in seven focus groups in three rural northern communities. The vast majority had a mobile phone (39/40, 98%), used text messages "all the time" (28/40, 70%), and surfed the Internet on their phone (37/40, 93%). Participants perceived SmartMom to be highly acceptable and relevant. The text message modality reflected how participants currently sought pregnancy-related information and provided them with local information tailored to their gestational age, which they had not received through other pregnancy resources. Women recommended adding the opportunity to receive supplemental streams of messages tailored to their individual needs, for example, depression, pregnancy after previous cesarean, >35 years of age, new immigrants, and harm reduction for smoking and alcohol.

Conclusions: This formative qualitative evaluation provides evidence that a prenatal education program by text messaging, SmartMom, is acceptable to the end users. These findings support the usability of the SmartMom program at a population level and the development of an evaluation program exploring the effects of the text messages on adoption of health-promoting behaviors and maternal-child health outcomes.

Keywords: health behavior; pregnancy; prenatal education; text messaging.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Home page for the SmartMom website.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Example health promotion messages provided through the SmartMom program.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Walker DS, Visger JM, Rossie D. Contemporary childbirth education models. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2009;54(6):469–476. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2009.02.013.S1526-9523(09)00070-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gagnon AJ, Sandall J. Individual or group antenatal education for childbirth or parenthood, or both. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;(3):CD002869. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002869.pub2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brixval CS, Axelsen SF, Andersen SK, Due P, Koushede V. The effect of antenatal education in small classes on obstetric and psycho-social outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol. Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 13;3:12. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-12. https://systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/2046... 2046-4053-3-12 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ferguson S, Davis D, Browne J. Does antenatal education affect labour and birth? A structured review of the literature. Women Birth. 2013 Mar;26(1):e5–e8. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2012.09.003.S1871-5192(12)00067-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Public Health Agency of Canada . What Mothers Say: The Canadian Maternity Experiences Survey. Ottawa, ON: Public Health Agency of Canada; 2009. [2017-01-27]. http://www.birthbythenumbers.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/WhatMothersS... .

LinkOut - more resources