Transportation and Centering Ability of Neoniti and ProTaper Instruments; A CBCT Assessment
- PMID: 28179923
- PMCID: PMC5282378
- DOI: 10.22037/iej.2017.09
Transportation and Centering Ability of Neoniti and ProTaper Instruments; A CBCT Assessment
Abstract
Introduction: Transportation is an important iatrogenic endodontic error which might cause failure. This study evaluated the canal transportation caused by Neoniti and ProTaper instruments, using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) cross sections.
Methods and materials: This in vitro experimental study was performed on 40 mesiobuccal roots of maxillary first molars. The teeth were scanned with CBCT. They were randomly divided into 2 groups (n=20) that were prepared using either Neoniti or ProTaper files. An endodontist prepared the canal according to the manufacturer's guidelines. Prepared canals were re-scanned. The pre-instrumentation and post-instrumentation CBCT volumes were sectioned at 1 to 9-mm distances from the apex. The extent of canal dentine removal in mesial and distal directions were measured in each cross-section. Canal transportation and instrument centering ability were estimated based on the extents of root wall removal and were compared in both groups.
Results: The groups were rather similar in terms of transportation and centering ability (P>0.05). However, canal preparation on mesial and distal walls was statistically significantly less in the Neoniti group, at most cross-sections. Transportation of both groups was not significantly different (P>0.05). Centering ability of both instruments was not significantly different (P>0.05).
Conclusion: Neoniti and ProTaper instruments might have proper centering ability and minimum transportations. Both instruments might cause similar extents of transportation and centering abilities.
Keywords: Centering Ability; Nickel Titanium Instruments; Root Canal Preparation; Root Canal Treatment; Transportation.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Evaluation of the Root Canal Centering Ratio and Canal Transportation Associated With Three Rotary File Systems Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Analysis.Cureus. 2024 Oct 8;16(10):e71117. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71117. eCollection 2024 Oct. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39525218 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative evaluation of shaping ability of V-Taper 2H, ProTaper Next, and HyFlex CM in curved canals using cone-beam computed tomography: An in vitro Study.Indian J Dent Res. 2017 Mar-Apr;28(2):181-186. doi: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_34_16. Indian J Dent Res. 2017. PMID: 28611329
-
Comparison of canal transportation and centering ability of rotary protaper, one shape system and wave one system using cone beam computed tomography: An in vitro study.J Conserv Dent. 2014 Nov;17(6):561-5. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.144605. J Conserv Dent. 2014. PMID: 25506145 Free PMC article.
-
Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of ProTaper and SafeSider in Preparation of Curved Root Canals: A CBCT Evaluation.Iran Endod J. 2018 Spring;13(2):240-245. doi: 10.22037/iej.v13i2.19200. Iran Endod J. 2018. PMID: 29707022 Free PMC article.
-
In Vitro Research Methods Used to Evaluate Shaping Ability of Rotary Endodontic Files-A Literature Review.Dent J (Basel). 2024 Oct 21;12(10):334. doi: 10.3390/dj12100334. Dent J (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39452462 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Canal Straightening Following Overinstrumentation with Three Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments.J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2018 May-Jun;8(3):245-251. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_18_18. Epub 2018 May 17. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2018. PMID: 29911063 Free PMC article.
-
Simulated Evaluation of Tooth Fracture Resistance during Instrumentation with Single-and Multi-file Rotary Systems.Iran Endod J. 2021 Fall;16(4):232-237. doi: 10.22037/iej.v16i4.33882. Iran Endod J. 2021. PMID: 36704781 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Shaping ability of 2Shape and NeoNiTi rotary instruments in preparation of curved canals using micro-computed tomography.BMC Oral Health. 2021 Nov 19;21(1):595. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01961-x. BMC Oral Health. 2021. PMID: 34798874 Free PMC article.
-
Cyclic Fatigue Life of Two Single File Engine-Driven Systems in Simulated Curved Canals.Iran Endod J. 2018 Winter;13(1):61-65. doi: 10.22037/iej.v13i1.18037. Iran Endod J. 2018. PMID: 29692837 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of RaCe and Af f-one Systems by Cone-beam Computed Tomography: An in Vitro Study.Iran Endod J. 2024;19(3):193-198. doi: 10.22037/iej.v19i3.41837. Iran Endod J. 2024. PMID: 39086710 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Karabucak B, Gatan AJ, Hsiao C, Iqbal MK. A comparison of apical transportation and length control between EndoSequence and Guidance rotary instruments. J Endod. 2010;36(1):123–5. - PubMed
-
- García M, Duran-Sindreu F, Mercadé M, Bueno R, Roig M. A comparison of apical transportation between ProFile and RaCe rotary instruments. J Endod. 2012;38(7):990–2. - PubMed
-
- Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1971;32(2):271–5. - PubMed
-
- Alsudani D, Alshahrani S. A Comparison of the Canal Centering Ability of ProFile, K3, and RaCe Nickel Titanium Rotary Systems. J Endod. 2006;32(12):1198–201. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous