Heat pain detection threshold is associated with the area of secondary hyperalgesia following brief thermal sensitization: a study of healthy male volunteers
- PMID: 28184167
- PMCID: PMC5291329
- DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S121189
Heat pain detection threshold is associated with the area of secondary hyperalgesia following brief thermal sensitization: a study of healthy male volunteers
Erratum in
-
Erratum: Heat pain detection threshold is associated with the area of secondary hyperalgesia following brief thermal sensitization: a study of healthy male volunteers [Corrigendum].J Pain Res. 2017 May 11;10:1135. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S135707. eCollection 2017. J Pain Res. 2017. PMID: 28546771 Free PMC article.
Abstract
Introduction: The area of secondary hyperalgesia following brief thermal sensitization (BTS) of the skin and heat pain detection thresholds (HPDT) may both have predictive abilities in regards to pain sensitivity and clinical pain states. The association between HPDT and secondary hyperalgesia, however, remains unsettled, and the dissimilarities in physiologic properties suggest that they may represent 2 distinctively different pain entities. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between HPDT and BTS-induced secondary hyperalgesia.
Methods: A sample of 121 healthy male participants was included and tested on 2 separate study days with BTS (45°C, 3 minutes), HPDT, and pain during thermal stimulation (45°C, 1 minute). Areas of secondary hyperalgesia were quantified after monofilament pinprick stimulation. The pain catastrophizing scale (PCS) and hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) were also applied.
Results: A significant association between HPDT and the size of the area of secondary hyperalgesia (p<0.0001) was found. The expected change in area of secondary hyperalgesia due to a 1-degree increase in HPDT was estimated to be -27.38 cm2, 95% confidence interval (CI) of -37.77 to -16.98 cm2, with an R2 of 0.19. Likewise, a significant association between HADS-depression subscore and area of secondary hyperalgesia (p=0.046) was found, with an estimated expected change in secondary hyperalgesia to a 1-point increase in HADS-depression subscore of 11 cm2, 95% CI (0.19-21.82), and with R2 of 0.03. We found no significant associations between secondary hyperalgesia area and PCS score or pain during thermal stimulation.
Conclusion: HPDT and the area of secondary hyperalgesia after BTS are significantly associated; however, with an R2 of only 19%, HPDT only offers a modest explanation of the inter-participant variation in the size of the secondary hyperalgesia area elicited by BTS.
Keywords: catastrophization; central nervous system sensitization; central sensitization; healthy volunteers; hyperalgesia; pain; pain threshold; secondary hyperalgesia.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
Figures



References
-
- Werner MU, Mjobo HN, Nielsen PR, Rudin A. Prediction of postoperative pain: a systematic review of predictive experimental pain studies. Anesthesiology. 2010;112(6):1494–1502. - PubMed
-
- Arendt-Nielsen L, Hoeck HC. Optimizing the early phase development of new analgesics by human pain biomarkers. Expert Rev Neurother. 2011;11(11):1631–1651. - PubMed
-
- Chizh BA, Priestley T, Rowbotham M, Schaffler K. Predicting therapeutic efficacy – experimental pain in human subjects. Brain Res Rev. 2009;60(1):243–254. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources