Attention to body-parts varies with visual preference and verb-effector associations
- PMID: 28185087
- DOI: 10.1007/s10339-017-0792-y
Attention to body-parts varies with visual preference and verb-effector associations
Abstract
Theories of embodied conceptual meaning suggest fundamental relations between others' actions, language, and our own actions and visual attention processes. Prior studies have found that when people view an image of a neutral body in a scene they first look toward, in order, the head, torso, hands, and legs. Other studies show associations between action verbs and the body-effectors used in performing the action (e.g., "jump" with feet/legs; "talk" with face/head). In the present experiment, the visual attention of participants was recorded with a remote eye-tracking system while they viewed an image of an actor pantomiming an action and heard a concrete action verb. Participants manually responded whether or not the action image was a good example of the verb they heard. The eye-tracking results confirmed that participants looked at the head most, followed by the hands, and the feet least of all; however, visual attention to each of the body-parts also varied as a function of the effector associated with the spoken verb on image/verb congruent trials, particularly for verbs associated with the legs. Overall, these results suggest that language influences some perceptual processes; however, hearing auditory verbs did not alter the previously reported fundamental hierarchical sequence of directed attention, and fixations on specific body-effectors may not be essential for verb comprehension as peripheral visual cues may be sufficient to perform the task.
Keywords: Action perception; Embodied cognition; Verb processing; Visual attention.
Similar articles
-
Contribution of motor representations to action verb processing.Cognition. 2015 Jan;134:174-84. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.004. Epub 2014 Nov 6. Cognition. 2015. PMID: 25460390
-
Neural dissociations between action verb understanding and motor imagery.J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Oct;22(10):2387-400. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21386. J Cogn Neurosci. 2010. PMID: 19925195
-
Language-motor interference reflected in MEG beta oscillations.Neuroimage. 2015 Apr 1;109:438-48. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.077. Epub 2015 Jan 8. Neuroimage. 2015. PMID: 25576646
-
Embodied language: a review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension.Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008 Jun;61(6):825-50. doi: 10.1080/17470210701623605. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008. PMID: 18470815 Review.
-
On the temporal dynamics of language-mediated vision and vision-mediated language.Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Jun;137(2):181-9. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.09.008. Epub 2010 Oct 18. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011. PMID: 20961519 Review.
Cited by
-
Body representation in patients after vascular brain injuries.Cogn Process. 2017 Nov;18(4):359-373. doi: 10.1007/s10339-017-0831-8. Epub 2017 Aug 29. Cogn Process. 2017. PMID: 28852890 Free PMC article.
-
Differential contributions of body form, motion, and temporal information to subjective action understanding in naturalistic stimuli.Front Integr Neurosci. 2024 Mar 12;18:1302960. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2024.1302960. eCollection 2024. Front Integr Neurosci. 2024. PMID: 38533314 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources