Efficacy of pallidal stimulation in isolated dystonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

The aim of this review was to provide strong clinical evidence of the efficacy of deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the globus pallidus internus (GPi) in isolated inherited or idiopathic dystonia. Eligible studies were identified after a systematic literature review of the effects of bilateral GPi-DBS in isolated dystonia. Absolute and percentage changes from baseline in the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) motor and disability scores were pooled, and associations between treatment effect and patient characteristics were explored using meta-regression. In total, 24 studies were included in the meta-analysis, comprising 523 patients. The mean absolute and percentage improvements in BFMDRS motor score at the last follow-up (mean 32.5 months; 24 studies) were 26.6 points [95% confidence interval (CI), 22.4-30.8] and 65.2% (95% CI, 59.6-70.7), respectively. The corresponding changes in disability score at the last follow-up (mean 32.9 months; 14 studies) were 6.4 points (95% CI, 5.0-7.8) and 58.6% (95% CI, 50.3-66.9). Multivariate meta-regression of absolute scores indicated that higher BFMDRS motor and disability scores before surgery, together with younger age at time of surgery, were the main factors associated with significantly better DBS outcomes at the latest follow-up. Reporting of safety data was frequently inconsistent and could not be included in the meta-analysis. In conclusion, patients with isolated inherited or idiopathic dystonia significantly improved after GPi-DBS. Better outcomes were associated with greater dystonia severity at baseline. These findings should be taken into consideration for improving patient selection for DBS.

Keywords: deep brain stimulation; dystonia; globus pallidus; surgery.

Figure 1

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) flowchart. DBS, deep brain stimulation. EC, Exclusion criteria; IC, inclusion criteria.

Figure 2

Forest plots of changes in Burke–Fahn–Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) at last follow‐up. (a) Absolute (top) and percentage (bottom) change in motor; (b) absolute (top) and percentage (bottom) change in disability. CI, confidence interval. Negative changes indicate improvement.