Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Feb 10;6(2):e004659.
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.004659.

Frailty, Physical Activity, and Mobility in Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electrical Devices

Affiliations

Frailty, Physical Activity, and Mobility in Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electrical Devices

Daniel B Kramer et al. J Am Heart Assoc. .

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of measuring frailty in patients with cardiac implantable electrical devices while validating the physiologic significance of device-detected physical activity by evaluating its association with frailty and mobility.

Methods and results: Outpatients with cardiac implantable electrical devices compatible with physical activity analysis with at least 7 days of data were eligible. Office testing included frailty status (Study of Osteoporotic Fractures instrument), gait speed (m/s), mobility according to the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test (seconds), and daily physical activity (h/d) as measured by cardiac implantable electrical device. Among 219 patients, Study of Osteoporotic Fractures testing found 39.7% to be robust, 47.5% prefrail, and 12.8% frail. The mean gait speed for the cohort was 0.8±0.3 m/s, mean TUG time was 10.9±4.4 seconds, and mean activity was 2.8±1.9 h/d. Frail patients were markedly more likely to have gait speeds <0.8 m/s (OR 6.25, 95% CI 1.79-33.3). In unadjusted analyses each 1-hour increase in mean daily activity was associated with a 46% reduction of frail phenotype (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.40-0.74) versus robust and with a 27% reduction in the odds of having the prefrail phenotype (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.62-0.86). After adjustment this association per hour of activity persisted, with an adjusted OR for frailty of 0.71 (95% CI 0.51-0.99) and adjusted OR for prefrailty of 0.81 (95% CI 0.67-0.99).

Conclusions: Frailty and mobility limitation are common among cardiac implantable electrical device patients and are correlated to device-detected physical activity.

Keywords: aging; defibrillation; pacemaker; physical exercise.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flow and derivation of analytic sample.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Unadjusted association between activity and frailty.

References

    1. Green AR, Leff B, Wang Y, Spatz ES, Masoudi FA, Peterson PN, Daugherty SL, Matlock DD. Geriatric conditions in patients undergoing defibrillator implantation for prevention of sudden cardiac death: prevalence and impact on mortality. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016;9:23–30. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, Seeman T, Tracy R, Kop WJ, Burke G, McBurnie MA; Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group . Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56:M146–M156. - PubMed
    1. Afilalo J, Alexander KP, Mack MJ, Maurer MS, Green P, Allen LA, Popma JJ, Ferrucci L, Forman DE. Frailty assessment in the cardiovascular care of older adults. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:747–762. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Conraads VM, Spruit MA, Braunschweig F, Cowie MR, Tavazzi L, Borggrefe M, Hill MR, Jacobs S, Gerritse B, van Veldhuisen DJ. Physical activity measured with implanted devices predicts patient outcome in chronic heart failure. Circ Heart Fail. 2014;7:279–287. - PubMed
    1. Kadhiresan VA, Pastore J, Auricchio A, Sack S, Doelger A, Girouard S, Spinelli JC; PATH‐CHF Study Group: Pacing therapies in congestive heart failure. . A novel method—the activity log index—for monitoring physical activity of patients with heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 2002;89:1435–1437. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms