Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Jun;6(1):7-18.
doi: 10.1007/s40123-017-0080-z. Epub 2017 Feb 10.

A Review of Laser-Assisted Versus Traditional Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery

Affiliations
Review

A Review of Laser-Assisted Versus Traditional Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery

H Burkhard Dick et al. Ophthalmol Ther. 2017 Jun.

Abstract

The use of femtosecond laser surgery improves the precision and reproducibility of corneal incisions and the capsular opening; it also reduces the amount of ultrasound energy required for lens nucleus work-up. The rate of complications reported so far appears to be low. There are a number of contraindications such as a history of cornea and/or glaucoma surgery and certain anatomical features like deep-set eyes, kyphosis, tremor, and obesity. Visual recovery and refractive results of both techniques are excellent. Comparing laser cataract surgery (LCS) with manual cataract surgery (conventional phacoemulsification) based on meta-analysis currently reveals slight differences in refractive and visual outcome. Both methods are extremely successful and safe. LCS is a technique still on the rise, with its full potential not yet tapped.

Keywords: Capsulorhexis; Capsulotomy; Cataract; Effective phaco time; Endothelial cell count; Femtosecond laser; Intraocular lens; Laser cataract surgery; Manual phacoemulsification; Prostaglandin; Ultrasound.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Round, circular, centered capsulotomy in LCS with a 360° overlap on the IOL optic (intraoperative view through the OR microscope)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Preoperative planning of the intrastromal arcuate corneal incision in the femtosecond laser machine
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Intraoperative position check of the intrastromal incision using 3-D SD LIVE OCT (after docking). A change of length, depth, arc, centration method, and position is still possible
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Full fragmentation of the advanced cataractous lens using a two main cut pattern (with multiple repetitions herein) in LCS. Cavitation gas bubbles appear at the end of the lasing
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Screenshot of the planning in LCS (with main incision, two sideports, two arcuate incisions, capsulotomy, and lens fragmentation)
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Mini-capsulotomy on intraoperative laser system screen view demonstrating its centration, position, and size
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Primary posterior laser-assisted capsulotomy with the IOL in the capsular bag and some cavitation bubbles (intraoperative view through the OR microscope at the end of the surgery)

References

    1. Dick HB. Bladeless custom femtosecond laser-assisted refractive cataract surgery? Let’s give our latest breakthrough surgical technique a name that fits. J Refract Surg. 2015;31:346. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20150424-04. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nagy ZZ, Takacs A, Filkorn T, Sarayba M. Initial clinical evaluation of intraocular femtosecond laser in cataract surgery. J Refract Surg. 2009;25:1053–1060. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20091117-04. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nagy ZZ. New technology update: femtosecond laser in cataract surgery. Clin Ophthalmol. 2014;8:1157–1167. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S36040. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Popovic M, Campos-Möller X, Schlenker MB, Ahmed IIK. Efficacy and safety of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery compared with manual cataract surgery: a meta-analysis of 14,567 eyes. Ophthalmology. 2016;123:2113–2126. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.07.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Day AC, Gore DM, Bunce C, Evans JR. Laser-assisted cataract surgery versus standard ultrasound phacoemulsification cataract surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; Issue 7. Art. No. CD010735. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD010735.pub2. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources