Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Mar:88:135-140.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.01.007. Epub 2017 Jan 6.

Repeated CT scans in trauma transfers: An analysis of indications, radiation dose exposure, and costs

Affiliations

Repeated CT scans in trauma transfers: An analysis of indications, radiation dose exposure, and costs

Ricarda Hinzpeter et al. Eur J Radiol. 2017 Mar.

Abstract

Objectives: To identify the number of CT scans repeated in acute trauma patients receiving imaging before being referred to a trauma center, to define indications, and to assess radiation doses and costs of repeated CT.

Methods: This retrospective study included all adult trauma patients transferred from other hospitals to a Level-I trauma center during 2014. Indications for repeated CT scans were categorized into: inadequate CT image data transfer, poor image quality, repetition of head CT after head injury together with completion to whole-body CT (WBCT), and follow-up of injury known from previous CT. Radiation doses from repeated CT were determined; costs were calculated using a nation-wide fee schedule.

Results: Within one year, 85/298 (28.5%) trauma patients were transferred from another hospital because of severe head injury (n=45,53%) and major body trauma (n=23;27%) not manageable in the referring hospital, repatriation from a foreign country (n=14;16.5%), and no ICU-capacity (n=3;3.5%). Of these 85 patients, 74 (87%) had repeated CT in our center because of inadequate CT data transfer (n=29;39%), repetition of head CT with completion to WBCT (n=24;32.5%), and follow-up of known injury (n=21;28.5%). None occurred because of poor image quality. Cumulative dose length product (DLP) and annual costs of potential preventable, repeated CT (inadequate data transfer) was 631mSv (81'304mGy*cm) and 35'233€, respectively.

Conclusion: A considerable number of transferred trauma patients undergo potentially preventable, repeated CT, adding radiation dose to patients and costs to the health care system.

Keywords: Health care costs; Imaging; Radiation exposure; Trauma.

PubMed Disclaimer