Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Jun;216(6):552-556.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.006. Epub 2017 Feb 9.

Group prenatal care

Affiliations
Review

Group prenatal care

Sara E Mazzoni et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun.

Abstract

Patients participating in group prenatal care gather together with women of similar gestational ages and 2 providers who cofacilitate an educational session after a brief medical assessment. The model was first described in the 1990s by a midwife for low-risk patients and is now practiced by midwives and physicians for both low-risk patients and some high-risk patients, such as those with diabetes. The majority of literature on group prenatal care uses CenteringPregnancy, the most popular model. The first randomized controlled trial of CenteringPregnancy showed that it reduced the risk of preterm birth in low-risk women. However, recent meta-analyses have shown similar rates of preterm birth, low birthweight, and neonatal intensive care unit admission between women participating in group prenatal care and individual prenatal care. There may be subgroups, such as African Americans, who benefit from this type of prenatal care with significantly lower rates of preterm birth. Group prenatal care seems to result in increased patient satisfaction and knowledge and use of postpartum family planning as well as improved weight gain parameters. The literature is inconclusive regarding breast-feeding, stress, depression, and positive health behaviors, although it is theorized that group prenatal care positively affects these outcomes. It is unclear whether group prenatal care results in cost savings, although it may in large-volume practices if each group consists of approximately 8-10 women. Group prenatal care requires a significant paradigm shift. It can be difficult to implement and sustain. More randomized trials are needed to ascertain the true benefits of the model, best practices for implementation, and subgroups who may benefit most from this innovative way to provide prenatal care. In short, group prenatal care is an innovative and promising model with comparable pregnancy outcomes to individual prenatal care in the general population and improved outcomes in some demographic groups.

Keywords: CenteringPregnancy; group prenatal care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Reply.
    Mazzoni S, Carter EB. Mazzoni S, et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jan;218(1):148. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.08.118. Epub 2017 Sep 6. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018. PMID: 28888585 No abstract available.
  • Beyond the traditional models of group prenatal care: the case for Moms2B.
    Gabbe PT, Gabbe SG, Lynch CD. Gabbe PT, et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jan;218(1):147-148. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.08.117. Epub 2017 Sep 6. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018. PMID: 28888589 No abstract available.

Publication types

MeSH terms