Outcomes of medical malpractice claims in assisted reproductive technology over a 10-year period from a single carrier
- PMID: 28190212
- PMCID: PMC5401702
- DOI: 10.1007/s10815-017-0889-3
Outcomes of medical malpractice claims in assisted reproductive technology over a 10-year period from a single carrier
Abstract
Objective: Medical malpractice claims vary by specialty. Contributory factors to malpractice in reproductive endocrinology and infertility (REI) are not well defined. We sought to determine claims' frequency, basis of claims, and outcomes of settled claims in REI.
Design: This is a retrospective, descriptive review of 10 years of claims.
Setting: The setting is private practices.
Materials and methods: Claims were monitored within one malpractice carrier between 2006 and 2015 covering 10 practices and 184,015 IVF cycles. Total claims, basis of claims, and indemnity paid were evaluated.
Results: There were 176 incidents resulting in 30 settled claims with indemnity payments in 21. Categories of claims settled included misdiagnosis (N = 4), lack of informed consent (N = 5), embryology errors (N = 8), and surgical complications (N = 4). Total and average awards were $15,062,000 and $717,238, respectively. Misdiagnosis and lack of informed consent had highest total award amount at $11,583,000 accounting for 76% of award dollars. The two highest awards were $4.5 million and $3.0 million for cancer and genetic misdiagnosis, respectively. Excluding these two awards, payments totaled $7,562,000, ranged from $6000 to $900,000 and averaged $170,363. Errors in handling of embryos were highest in frequency accounting for 38% of claims paid for a total of $1,593,000 with average payment of $199,188. Settlements for surgical complications totaled $1,855,000 and averaged $463,750 per claim.
Conclusions: Misdiagnosis and lack of informed consent are the highest award categories. Embryology lab errors are the most frequent causes of claims with the lowest award per settlement. The average cost for claims settled is relatively high compared to settlements in other specialties.
Keywords: Claim settlements; Medical error; Medical malpractice; Misdiagnosis.
Conflict of interest statement
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Van Noord I, Eikens MP, Hanersma AM, Bruijne MC. Application of root cause analysis on malpractice claim files related to diagnostic failures. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19(6):e21. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
