Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr 30;23(2):218-228.
doi: 10.5056/jnm16100.

A Double-blind, Randomized, Multicenter Clinical Trial Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of Esomeprazole Single Therapy Versus Mosapride and Esomeprazole Combined Therapy in Patients with Esophageal Reflux Disease

Affiliations

A Double-blind, Randomized, Multicenter Clinical Trial Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of Esomeprazole Single Therapy Versus Mosapride and Esomeprazole Combined Therapy in Patients with Esophageal Reflux Disease

Ju Yup Lee et al. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. .

Erratum in

  • Corrigendum.
    Lee JY, Kim SK, Cho KB, Park KS, Kwon JG, Jung JT, Kim EY, Jang BI, Lee SH; Daegu-Gyeongbuk Gastrointestinal Study Group (DGSG). Lee JY, et al. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2019 Jan 31;25(1):175. doi: 10.5056/jnm25013. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2019. PMID: 30646491 Free PMC article.

Abstract

Background/aims: We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination therapy in erosive reflux disease (ERD) patients by comparing endoscopic healing rates according to the Los Angeles classification for esomeprazole alone, and esomeprazole plus mosapride.

Methods: A total of 116 ERD patients were randomized to receive esomeprazole 40 mg once daily plus mosapride 5 mg 3 times daily (E+M group), or esomeprazole plus placebo (E only group) for 8 weeks. Patients recorded gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptom questionnaire at weeks 4 and 8. The primary endpoint was the endoscopic healing rate of ERD after 8 weeks of treatment.

Results: Endoscopic healing rates according to the Los Angeles classification was 32 (66.7%) in the E+M group and 26 (60.5%) in the E only group, but there was no statistically significant difference between the groups. Only at 4 weeks, the total GERD symptom score changes relative to the baseline significantly improved in the E+M group than that of the E only group (-13.4 ± 14.7 vs -8.0 ± 12.3, P = 0.041), and upper abdominal pain and belching score changes showed significantly improved in the E+M group than that of the E only group (P = 0.018 and P = 0.013, respectively).

Conclusions: The combination of a proton pump inhibitor with mosapride shows a tendency for upper abdominal pain, belching, and total GERD symptoms scores to improve more rapidly. This suggests that combination therapy with esomeprazole and mosapride will be useful for rapid improvement of specific GERD symptoms, such as upper abdominal pain and belching in ERD patients.

Keywords: Gastroesophageal reflux; Gastrointestinal motility; Proton pump inhibitors; Therapeutics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Subject disposition and analysis population of the study. E+M group, esomeprazole 40 mg once daily plus mosapride 5 mg 3 times daily for 8 weeks; E only group, esomeprazole 40 mg once daily plus placebo 5 mg 3 times daily for 8 weeks.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Improved rates in total gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms after 4 and 8 weeks of medication (intention-to-treat analysis). E+M group, esomeprazole 40 mg once daily plus mosapride 5 mg 3 times daily for 8 weeks; E only group, esomeprazole 40 mg once daily plus placebo 5 mg 3 times daily for 8 weeks.

References

    1. Vakil N, van Zanten SV, Kahrilas P, Dent J, Jones R. The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a global evidence-based consensus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:1900–1920. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00630.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fock KM, Talley NJ, Fass R, et al. Asia-Pacific consensus on the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: update. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;23:8–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2007.05249.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Min YW, Shin YW, Cheon GJ, et al. Recurrence and its impact on the health-related quality of life in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a prospective follow-up analysis. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016;22:86–93. doi: 10.5056/jnm15124. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kim SE, Kim N, Oh S, et al. Predictive factors of response to proton pump inhibitors in Korean patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;21:69–77. doi: 10.5056/jnm14078. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goh KL, Choi MG, Hsu PI, et al. Pharmacological and safety profile of dexlansoprazole: a new proton pump inhibitor – implications for treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease in the Asia pacific region. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016;22:355–366. doi: 10.5056/jnm15150. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources