Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016;11(4):283-287.
doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2016.64997. Epub 2016 Dec 30.

Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a single centre experience

Affiliations

Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a single centre experience

Tomasz Jakimowicz et al. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2016.

Abstract

Introduction: The advantages of a minimally invasive nephrectomy are a faster recovery and better quality of life for the donors. Until recently, the majority of donor nephrectomies in Poland were done by open surgery.

Aim: To present a single centre experience in hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (HALDN).

Material and methods: The first videoscopic left donor nephrectomy in Poland was performed in our department in 2003 using a hand-assisted retroperitoneal approach. From 2011, we changed the method to a transperitoneal approach and started to harvest also right kidneys. Since then, it has become the method of choice for donor nephrectomy and has been performed in 59 cases. Preoperatively, kidneys were assessed by scintigraphy and by angio-computed tomography. We harvested 32 left and 27 right kidneys. There were double renal arteries in 2 cases and triple renal arteries in 1 case. The warm ischaemia time (WIT) was 80-420 s (average 176.13 s); operative time was 85-210 min (average 140 min).

Results: All procedures were uncomplicated, and all donors were discharged after 2-8 days with normal creatinine levels. The average follow-up period lasted 23 months (1-51 months). Out of all of the cases, 1 case had two minor complications, while all others were uneventful. None of the donors were lost to follow-up. All of the kidneys were transplanted. There were 2 cases of delayed graft function (DGF) and 2 cases of ureter necrosis. One of those kidneys was lost in the third postoperative week.

Conclusions: Our limited experience shows that HALDN is a safe method and should be used routinely instead of open surgery.

Keywords: hand-assisted laparoscopy; kidney donation; kidney transplantation; videoscopic nephrectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. US Department of Health and Human Services. Annual Report of the US Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network and the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients: Transplant Data 1998-2007. 2008.
    1. Ratner LE, Ciseck LJ, Moore RG, et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation. 1995;60:1047–9. - PubMed
    1. Ratner LE, Montgomery RA, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: the four year Johns Hopkins University experience. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1999;14:2090–3. - PubMed
    1. Schweitzer EJ, Wilson J, Jacobs S, et al. Increased rates of donation with laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Ann Surg. 2000;232:392–400. - PMC - PubMed
    1. US. Renal Data System. USRDS 2011 Annual data Report: Atlas of end-stage renal disease in the Unites States. 2011.

LinkOut - more resources