Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2016 Dec 26;7(Suppl 43):S1107-S1112.
doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.196773. eCollection 2016.

Single-staged resections and 3D reconstructions of the nasion, glabella, medial orbital wall, and frontal sinus and bone: Long-term outcome and review of the literature

Affiliations
Case Reports

Single-staged resections and 3D reconstructions of the nasion, glabella, medial orbital wall, and frontal sinus and bone: Long-term outcome and review of the literature

Jeremy Ciporen et al. Surg Neurol Int. .

Abstract

Background: Aesthetic facial appearance following neurosurgical ablation of frontal fossa tumors is a primary concern for patients and neurosurgeons alike. Craniofacial reconstruction procedures have drastically evolved since the development of three-dimensional computed tomography imaging and computer-assisted programming. Traditionally, two-stage approaches for resection and reconstruction were used; however, these two-stage approaches have many complications including cerebrospinal fluid leaks, necrosis, and pneumocephalus.

Case description: We present two successful cases of single-stage osteoma resection and craniofacial reconstruction in a 26-year-old female and 65-year-old male. The biopolymer implants were preselected and contoured based on imaging prior to surgery. The ideal selection of appropriate flaps for reconstruction was imperative. The flaps were well vascularized and included a pedicle for easy translocation. Using a titanium mesh biopolymer implant for reconstruction in conjunction with a forehead flap proved advantageous, and the benefits of single-stage approaches were apparent. The patients recovered quickly after the surgery with complete resection of the osteoma and good aesthetic appearance. The flap adhered to the biopolymer implant, and the cosmetic appearance years after surgery remained decent. The gap between the bone and implant was less than 2 mm. The patients are highly satisfied with the symmetrical appearance of the reconstruction.

Conclusions: Advances in technology are allowing neurosurgeons unprecedented opportunities to design complex yet feasible single-stage craniofacial reconstructions that improve a patient's quality of life by enhancing facial contours, aesthetics, and symmetry.

Keywords: Biopolymers; craniofacial reconstruction; implants; osteoma; single-stage approach.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Osteoma involving the frontal sinus, nasion, glabella, and medial orbital wall in a 26-year-old female
Figure 2
Figure 2
Three-dimensional skull model to aid in surgical planning
Figure 3
Figure 3
Single staged resection and three-dimensional reconstruction: Osteoma involving the frontal sinus, nasion, glabella, and medial orbital wall in a 26-year-old female
Figure 4
Figure 4
Postoperative picture showing good cosmetic outcome
Figure 5
Figure 5
Osteoma involving the medial orbital wall, nasion, glabella, frontal bone and sinus, ethmoids, cribriform with displacement of the medial rectus and optic nerve
Figure 6
Figure 6
Complete total resection of the osteoma using a combined endonasal endoscopic approach with bifrontal craniotomy
Figure 7
Figure 7
Combined endoscopic endonasal and bifrontal craniotomy with preoperative custom three-dimensional reconstruction
Figure 8
Figure 8
Combined endoscopic endonasal and bifrontal craniotomy with single staged custom three-dimensional reconstruction at 2 weeks postoperatively

References

    1. Akadiri OA. Evolution and trends in reconstructive facial surgery: An update. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2012;11:466–72. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bluebond-Langner R, Rodriguez ED. Application of skeletal buttress analogy in composite facial reconstruction. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2009;2:19–25. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chae MP, Rozen WM, McMenamin PG, Findlay MW, Spychal RT, Hunter-Smith DJ. Emerging Applications of Bedside 3D Printing in Plastic Surgery. Front Surg. 2015;2:25. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chenard KE, Teven CM, He TC, Reid RR. Bone morphogenetic proteins in craniofacial surgery: Current techniques, clinical experiences, and the future of personalized stem cell therapy. J Biomed Biotech 2012. 2012:601549. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Demonte F, Moore BA, Chang DW. Skull base reconstruction in the pediatric patient. Skull Base. 2007;17:39–51. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources