Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2017 May;124(6):863-871.
doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14528. Epub 2017 Feb 14.

Participation in clinical trials improves outcomes in women's health: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Participation in clinical trials improves outcomes in women's health: a systematic review and meta-analysis

S K Nijjar et al. BJOG. 2017 May.

Abstract

Background: Previous reviews examining the effect of participation in trials on outcomes have not consistently shown benefit. Obstetrics and gynaecology is a unique disease area posing challenges for both researchers and patients.

Objectives: To determine whether participation in randomised controlled trials (RCTs), compared with non-participation, has a beneficial effect on women's health.

Search strategy: Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and PsycInfo were searched up to December 2015.

Selection criteria: We selected studies that reported the same clinical outcomes for participants in a women's health RCT and a comparable non-participant cohort.

Data collection and analysis: Data were extracted on quality, characteristics and study results. Outcomes were compared using logistic regression.

Main results: There were 21 relevant studies (20 160 women, 4759 outcome events). Trial participants, compared with non-participants, had 25% better odds of improved outcomes on average (OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.64-0.87; I2 = 64.3%). The beneficial effect of participating in a trial was larger in comparisons where: RCTs were of high quality (OR 0.62; 95% CI 0.50-0.76) versus low (OR 0.92; 95% CI 0.74-1.16); and RCT intervention was not available to non-participants (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.47-0.69) versus when it was (OR 1.13; 95% CI 0.89-1.44). The effect of trial participation was not influenced by effect size within the RCT (P = 0.48), whether funding was received or not (P = 0.13), whether non-participants received any treatment or not (P = 0.49), and the quality of the comparison of RCT participants with non-participants (P = 0.88).

Conclusions: Women participating in RCTs on average experienced better outcomes compared with those outside trials.

Tweetable abstract: Participants in obstetric and gynaecology RCTs experience better outcomes compared with non-participants.

Keywords: Neonate; randomised; systematic review; trial participation; women's health.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources