Prognostic Value of Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Pressure in Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
- PMID: 28197246
- PMCID: PMC5295567
- DOI: 10.14740/cr406w
Prognostic Value of Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Pressure in Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Abstract
Background: Elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) has been reported to predict an increased mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. However, its prognostic value in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) remains unclear.
Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of NSTEMI patients who underwent coronary angiography between January 2013 and June 2014. We excluded patients who did not undergo LVEDP measurements. Baseline and angiographic characteristics, in-hospital heart failure as well as in-hospital mortality were recorded.
Results: After exclusion, 367 patients were included in the final analysis. The median (interquartile range) LVEDP was 19 mm Hg (14 - 24 mm Hg). By receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the optimal cutoff value for predicting in-hospital mortality was 22 mm Hg (area under the curve 0.80, sensitivity 80%, and specificity 71%). Of 367 patients, 109 patients (29.7%) had LVEDP > 22 mm Hg. Patients with LVEDP > 22 mm Hg had a greater number of comorbidities. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of multi-vessel disease. Patients with LVEDP > 22 mm Hg had a significantly higher rate of in-hospital heart failure (22.0% vs. 13.2%, P = 0.03) and in-hospital mortality (3.7% vs. 0.4%, P = 0.03) than those with LVEDP ≤ 22 mm Hg.
Conclusion: Elevated LVEDP was significantly associated with a higher in-hospital mortality in patients with NSTEMI.
Keywords: Acute coronary syndrome; Heart failure; Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure; Mortality; Non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
Similar articles
-
Ratio of systolic blood pressure to left ventricular end-diastolic pressure at the time of primary percutaneous coronary intervention predicts in-hospital mortality in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Sep 1;90(3):389-395. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26963. Epub 2017 Mar 17. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017. PMID: 28303647
-
Prognostic implications of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Findings from the Assessment of Pexelizumab in Acute Myocardial Infarction study.Am Heart J. 2013 Nov;166(5):913-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.08.006. Epub 2013 Sep 24. Am Heart J. 2013. PMID: 24176448 Clinical Trial.
-
Clinical factors affecting left ventricular end-diastolic pressure in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.Ann Palliat Med. 2020 Jul;9(4):1834-1840. doi: 10.21037/apm.2020.03.22. Epub 2020 Mar 22. Ann Palliat Med. 2020. PMID: 32279513
-
Prognostic Value of LVEDP in Acute Myocardial Infarction: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2018 Feb;11(1):33-35. doi: 10.1007/s12265-017-9776-7. Epub 2017 Dec 14. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2018. PMID: 29243014
-
Contemporary NSTEMI management: the role of the hospitalist.Hosp Pract (1995). 2020 Feb;48(1):1-11. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2020.1701329. Epub 2020 Feb 20. Hosp Pract (1995). 2020. PMID: 31815570 Review.
Cited by
-
Isovolumic relaxation intraventricular pressure difference predicts elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure in patients with coronary artery disease.Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 13;14(1):27764. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-79278-2. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39533061 Free PMC article.
-
Corrected QT Interval Prolongations in Patients with Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome.J Tehran Heart Cent. 2018 Oct;13(4):173-179. J Tehran Heart Cent. 2018. PMID: 30972115 Free PMC article.
-
Left Atrial Volume Index to Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Ratio Predicted Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event in ST-Elevated Myocardial Infarction Patients during 8 Years of Follow-up.J Cardiovasc Echogr. 2021 Oct-Dec;31(4):227-233. doi: 10.4103/jcecho.jcecho_38_21. Epub 2022 Jan 24. J Cardiovasc Echogr. 2021. PMID: 35284216 Free PMC article.
-
Noninvasive assessment of myocardial work during left ventricular isovolumic relaxation in patients with diastolic dysfunction.BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023 Mar 10;23(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12872-023-03156-4. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023. PMID: 36899310 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Halkin A, Stone GW, Dixon SR, Grines CL, Tcheng JE, Cox DA, Garcia E. et al. Impact and determinants of left ventricular function in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2005;96(3):325–331. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.03.069. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Burns RJ, Gibbons RJ, Yi Q, Roberts RS, Miller TD, Schaer GL, Anderson JL. et al. The relationships of left ventricular ejection fraction, end-systolic volume index and infarct size to six-month mortality after hospital discharge following myocardial infarction treated by thrombolysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39(1):30–36. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01711-9. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Bagai A, Armstrong PW, Stebbins A, Mahaffey KW, Hochman JS, Weaver WD, Patel MR. et al. Prognostic implications of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Findings from the Assessment of Pexelizumab in Acute Myocardial Infarction study. Am Heart J. 2013;166(5):913–919. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.08.006. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources