Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan 20;8(2):266-269.
doi: 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.6b00498. eCollection 2017 Feb 9.

125I-F56 Peptide as Radioanalysis Agent Targeting VEGFR1 in Mice Xenografted with Human Gastric Tumor

Affiliations

125I-F56 Peptide as Radioanalysis Agent Targeting VEGFR1 in Mice Xenografted with Human Gastric Tumor

Hua Zhu et al. ACS Med Chem Lett. .

Abstract

125I-Radiolabeled F56 peptide was designed as a radioactive analogue of F56 (peptide WHSDMEWWYLLG) to bind with VEGFR1 receptor. It was synthesized in high radiochemical yield and specific activity. The in vitro stability of 125I-F56 was tested, and the bioactivity of 125I-F56 was confirmed by both cell uptake and binding affinity measurement in VEGFR1 positive BGC-823 cells. The time-radioactivity relationship and biodistribution of 125I-F56 tracer were conducted using nude mice bearing human gastric carcinoma BGC-823, by noninvasive micro-SPECT/CT imaging. The tracer's tumor uptake was further confirmed by autoradiography and HE stain of 125I-F56 in tumor tissues ex vivo. Those results demonstrated that 125I-F56 holds great potential as a diagnostic agent in both molecular imaging and radioanalysis probe for gastric cancer.

Keywords: 125I−F56; gastric cancer; radioanalysis; vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Figures

Scheme 1
Scheme 1. Schematic Illustration of 125I-Radiolabeling of F56 Peptide by Iodogen Vessel
The blue dotted circle indicates the reactive amino acids where radioactive 125I may be attached.
Figure 1
Figure 1
HPLC chromatograms of 125I–F56 performed with an RP-18 column. HPLC analysis revealed that the radiochemical purity of 125I–F56 was 94%. (A) UV detection showed that the chromatographic peak of unreacted F56 peptide appeared at 7.8 min. (B) Radiation detection showed that the radiation peak of 125I–F56 appeared at 8.5 min.
Figure 2
Figure 2
In vitro BGC-823 cell uptake. The cell uptake data were expressed as the percentage of the radioactivity measured with respect to the total radioactive compound used. **P < 0.01 from student’s t test.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Binding affinity assay of 125I–F56 to BGC-823 cells. (A) BGC-823 cells were exposed to increasing concentrations of 125I–F56 peptide for 4 h at 37 °C, showing saturation binding. The binding constant was 66 nM, according to a one-site binding model. (B) BGC-823 cells were incubated with increasing concentrations of F56 peptide for 2 h at 37 °C, and the F56 peptide concentration was determined by the antibody against F56 peptide, but conjugated HRP label, measured at 490 nm absorbance.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Biodistribution of 125I–F56 in mice xenografted with BGC-823 gastric cancer cells.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Micro-SPECT images of 125I–F56 in human gastric cancer cell BGC-823 bearing nude mice at 4 h postinjection and 5 h postcoinjection with 0.1 mg of F56 peptide as block agent. Left, coronal imaging; middle, sagittal imaging; right, coronal imaging of blocked group. The arrow indicates the location of the tumor.
Figure 6
Figure 6
MIP Micro-SPECT/CT imaging of 125I–F56 (left) and SPECT images of 125I–F56 coadministration with 0.1 mg of F56 peptide as block agent (right) in human gastric cancer cell BGC-823 bearing nude mice. P means prone position. The red arrow indicates the location of the tumor. The white dotted square (and oval) shows the position and the extension of the tumor, which were further examined by autoradiography imaging in dissected tumor tissue.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chen W.; Zheng R.; Baade P. D.; Zhang S.; Zeng H.; Bray F.; Jemal A.; Yu X. Q.; He J. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. Ca-Cancer J. Clin. 2016, 66, 115.10.3322/caac.21338. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Oh C. M.; Won Y. J.; Jung K. W.; Kong H. J.; Cho H.; Lee J. K.; Lee D. H.; Lee K. H. Cancer Statistics in Korea: Incidence, Mortality, Survival, and Prevalence in 2013. Cancer Res. Treat 2016, 48, 436.10.4143/crt.2016.089. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kwee R. M.; Kwee T. C. Imaging in local staging of gastric cancer: a systematic review. J. Clin. Oncol. 2007, 25, 2107.10.1200/JCO.2006.09.5224. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cardoso R.; Coburn N.; Seevaratnam R.; Sutradhar R.; Lourenco L. G.; Mahar A.; Law C.; Yong E.; Tinmouth J. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the utility of EUS for preoperative staging for gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 2012, 15, 19.10.1007/s10120-011-0115-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Britton T.; Robinson N. Pitfalls and Pearls of Wisdom in 18F-FDG PET Imaging of Tumors. J. Nucl. Med. Technol. 2016, 44, 59.10.2967/jnmt.115.170803. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources