Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Dec;18(1):22.
doi: 10.1186/s10194-017-0731-4. Epub 2017 Feb 14.

Effects of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation on attack frequency over time and expanded response rates in patients with chronic cluster headache: a post hoc analysis of the randomised, controlled PREVA study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effects of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation on attack frequency over time and expanded response rates in patients with chronic cluster headache: a post hoc analysis of the randomised, controlled PREVA study

Charly Gaul et al. J Headache Pain. 2017 Dec.

Abstract

Background: In the PREVention and Acute treatment of chronic cluster headache (PREVA) study, attack frequency reductions from baseline were significantly more pronounced with non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation plus standard of care (nVNS + SoC) than with SoC alone. Given the intensely painful and frequent nature of chronic cluster headache attacks, additional patient-centric outcomes, including the time to and level of therapeutic response, were evaluated in a post hoc analysis of the PREVA study.

Findings: After a 2-week baseline phase, 97 patients with chronic cluster headache entered a 4-week randomised phase to receive nVNS + SoC (n = 48) or SoC alone (n = 49). All 92 patients who continued into a 4-week extension phase received nVNS + SoC. Compared with SoC alone, nVNS + SoC led to a significantly lower mean weekly attack frequency by week 2 of the randomised phase; the attack frequency remained significantly lower in the nVNS + SoC group through week 3 of the extension phase (P < 0.02). Attack frequencies in the nVNS + SoC group were significantly lower at all study time points than they were at baseline (P < 0.05). Response rates were significantly greater with nVNS + SoC than with SoC alone when response was defined as attack frequency reductions of ≥25%, ≥50%, and ≥75% from baseline (≥25% and ≥50%, P < 0.001; ≥75%, P = 0.009). The 100% response rate was 8% with nVNS + SoC and 0% with SoC alone.

Conclusions: Prophylactic nVNS led to rapid, significant, and sustained reductions in chronic cluster headache attack frequency within 2 weeks after its addition to SoC and was associated with significantly higher ≥25%, ≥50%, and ≥75% response rates than SoC alone. The rapid decrease in weekly attack frequency justifies a 4-week trial period to identify responders to nVNS, with a high degree of confidence, among patients with chronic cluster headache.

Keywords: Attack frequency; Chronic cluster headache; Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation; PREVA; Patient-centric outcomes; Prophylactic treatment; Prophylaxis; Response rate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PREVA Study Design. Abbreviations: nVNS, non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation; SoC, standard of care
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Mean Attack Frequencies (mITT Populationa). Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; mITT, modified intent-to-treat; nVNS, non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation; SoC, standard of care. a Subjects with available data for each study week. b From the t test
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Global Change in Weekly Attack Frequency at the End of the Randomised Phase (mITT Populationa). Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; mITT, modified intent-to-treat; nVNS, non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation; SoC, standard of care. a Subjects with available data for each study week. b From the t test
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Response Rates (mITT Populationa). Abbreviations: mITT, modified intent-to-treat; nVNS, non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation; SoC, standard of care. a Subjects with available data for each study week. b From the Fisher exact or chi-square test as appropriate

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fischera M, Marziniak M, Gralow I, Evers S. The incidence and prevalence of cluster headache: a meta-analysis of population-based studies. Cephalalgia. 2008;28:614–618. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2008.01592.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gaul C, Finken J, Biermann J, et al. Treatment costs and indirect costs of cluster headache: a health economics analysis. Cephalalgia. 2011;31:1664–1672. doi: 10.1177/0333102411425866. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Martelletti P. Cluster headache management and beyond. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2015;16:1411–1415. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2015.1052741. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version) Cephalalgia. 2013;33:629–808. doi: 10.1177/0333102413485658. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rozen TD. Cluster headache: diagnosis and treatment. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2005;9:135–140. doi: 10.1007/s11916-005-0052-1. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types